My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
1993-1999
>
1998
>
03-10-1998 SPECIAL
>
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 2:40:55 PM
Creation date
12/2/2015 2:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
3/10/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> the powers and process for tax abatement. Some highlights of the abatement <br /> authority include: <br /> • • The abatement is granted individually by each political subdivision (city, <br /> county, school district). <br /> • Compared with TIF, the process to grant an abatement is simple. The <br /> basic process requirement is a public hearing. Following the hearing, <br /> the governing body adopt a resolution specifying the terms of the abate- <br /> ment. <br /> • Abatements may be granted for no longer than ten years. Abatements <br /> by school districts are subject to annual reauthorization. <br /> • Unless the authorizing resolution prohibits change, the abatement may <br /> be reviewed and modified every second year after its approval. <br /> Abatements pledged to pay bonds are not subject to periodic review. <br /> • In any year, the total taxes abated by a political subdivision may not <br /> exceed the greater of 5% of the current levy or$100,000. <br /> • Taxes cannot be abated for property located within a tax increment <br /> financing district. <br /> • The statute grants the authority to issue general obligation bonds sup- <br /> ported by the collection of abated taxes. The proceeds of the bonds may <br /> be used to pay for(1) public improvements that benefit the property, (2) <br /> land acquisition, (3) reimbursement to the property owner for improve- <br /> ments to the property, and (4)the costs of issuing the bonds. <br /> The actual application of the abatement legislation will require additional <br /> study and analysis. <br /> The bonding authority should be approached carefully. The statute does not <br /> specifically exempt this debt from a referendum. It may be possible to pledge <br /> abated property taxes as revenue to another type of debt. The abatement will <br /> function more like a rebate. A property owner's taxes will not be reduced. <br /> The amount abated is included in the tax levy, collected, and paid to the prop- <br /> erty owner or used by the political subdivision pursuant to the statute and the <br /> enabling resolution. <br /> This process makes timing an important factor. Since the estimated total <br /> abatement must be added to the proposed and final tax levy for the political <br /> subdivision, abatements become tied to the general levy process. You must <br /> understand the levy process to know when abatement revenue will first <br /> become available. Levy limits may complicate the use of tax abatements in <br /> 1998 and 1999. <br /> Public improvements are often financed using the power to levy special Special Assessments <br /> assessments (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429). A special assessments is a <br /> means for benefitting properties to pay for all or part of the costs associated <br /> with improvements and to spread the impact over a period of years. From a <br /> city perspective, this authority provides an important means of raising capital. <br /> • Special assessments can be used to finance a wide range of public <br /> • improvements. <br /> A New Bridge • <br /> Revitalizing Monticello's Downtown and Rlverfront - <br /> Page 4:15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.