Laserfiche WebLink
tion and the vision the city has for the project. Those developers who are <br /> interested at that point and those that remain good prospects, should be asked <br /> to meet with the EDA, HRA and/or City Council in a semi-formal interview. <br /> The developer that is seen as the best fit should then be selected to be a part of <br /> a "team," of which the city is a very active partner. <br /> This process will more quickly identify those that can perform according to the <br /> city's desires, and is a more active approach to finding a development partner. <br /> This process (in fact, any development process) should be expected to take a <br /> minimum of 18 months. The advantage is that the city and the developer end <br /> up working together to make the right things happen. <br /> Care must be exercised in this process —developers do not typically hold the <br /> same regard for a community's values and vision. Even as they advocate for a <br /> "market-tested" product (a building they have built somewhere other than <br /> Monticello), their projects must "fit" the community's vision. Larger projects <br /> (such as the redevelopment of the mall, a hotel or other large projects) would <br /> likely involve developers from outside of Monticello. They will be interested <br /> because there is a market here, but the community will still need to "market" <br /> its local assets to get the best product. In these types of projects the city will <br /> undoubtedly be asked to play a role; when the City becomes involved (assem- <br /> bling land or providing other financial assistance), they trade those assets for a <br /> movement by the developer toward the community's vision. Economic viabil- <br /> ity can still be achieved even though it is not a standard developer product, but <br /> the city will have to play a very active role to make the equation balance. <br /> . Private sector development usually cannot achieve the intentions of a revital- <br /> ization effort. In this plan, centers of activity would be created to promote <br /> economic viability and to spur local and outside interests to commit to private <br /> sector investment. Some of the centers of activity will be private sector initia- <br /> tives that are funded, in part, by the community; some will be public sector <br /> activities that are funded entirely by the community. <br /> The concept of the "new bridge" focuses on the creation of centers of activity Centers of Activity <br /> within a clearly defined downtown boundary. This allows for the attractions to <br /> be created that draw people to downtown, but does not permit for the uses of <br /> downtown to sprawl across lines that are oriented to neighborhood uses. The <br /> centers of activity idea is important because the downtown needs people — <br /> customers — to survive; without more people, downtown will languish. <br /> Services like a post office or a bank encourage people to come to downtown <br /> on a regular basis; grocery stores also generate frequent visits by its customers. <br /> The goal of the plan is to keep those uses in downtown and create new uses <br /> that will continue to draw people. <br /> New functions and uses serve the activity center goal in this plan. A civic and <br /> institutional core will become the "new bridge," linking the riverfront and <br /> existing downtown to the Monticello mall with uses serving the civic and <br /> social functions of the Monticello community: a City Hall, library, family cen- <br /> ter, facility for county services, and history, arts and culture center -- like the - <br /> A New Bridge L <br /> Revitalizing Monticello's Downtown and RIVerfront` ^ <br /> Page 3:5 <br />