Laserfiche WebLink
September 7, 2004 _Page 3 of 4 <br />Budget Memo <br /> <br />The 16.1 Net Tax Capacity increase provides the City Council with lots of options in addressing city <br />needs for 2005 and the 2005 budget. This is especially tree when considering the following: the fire <br />vehicle associated with the fire prevention specialist (if this position is hired) can be purchased this <br />year or with equipment reserves and not be part of the budget; some proposed new positions could <br />begin after the January 1, 2005 date (please note that if too many of these positions are scheduled to <br />start later in the year, then undo financial pressure will be put on the 2006 budget); more than the <br />$90,500 gap discussed on August 23 was made in cuts; and if the fire prevention specialist is hired <br />then an additional $15,000 budget reduction can be made by deleting the contract for apartment <br />inspections. As noted earlier, at the 16.1 Net Tax Capacity increase amount, the city has available an <br />additional $402,807 in taxes without any tax rate change. Even with some of these funds being <br />allocated to streets and equipment, a substantial amount of additional funds are available to be used <br />in the general fund at the discretion of the City Council. This amount nearly matches the amount <br />needed for the recommended additional employees. Please see the attached list of possible 2005 <br />staff additions. With the 16.1% NTC increase and by way of shifting a few expenditures around and <br />hiring some employees after January 1, the City Council has numerous budget and tax options <br />available to them including the following: <br /> <br />Add another employee, specifically the CSO Officer <br />Shift some equipment into the general fund. This shift would be especially relevant <br />as the first payment on the fire truck is planned to come from equipment reserves <br />versus the tax levy. (The truck is being financed with equipment certificates but <br />reserves and not the tax levy is being proposed for the 2005 payment.) Equipment <br />financing is getting to be a more significant CIP issue and this will be a big <br />discussion point with the City Council when the five-year CIP is updated later in the <br />year. <br />Add back into the budget some of the supplies that were cut. <br />Reduce the city tax rate...A 1% tax rate (about .04...going from 43.78 to 43.38) is <br />approximately $75,000. <br />Or, a combination of some of the above. <br /> <br />A couple of issues for the City Council to take into consideration during their deliberations are that <br />1) levy limits may not be gone forever and that we may see them put on municipalities again in the <br />future, and 2) I believe that growth is slowing and that the NTC increases will begin to be lower <br />after 2006. In this regard, I think that we have one more "good year" (so that the catch up from the <br />LGA cuts will be complete) but after 2006, the increases will be more modest. Finally, the City <br />Council should note that while the proposed budget increase and tax increase is one of the largest in <br />recent memory, it is following a 2004 budget that had one of the smallest increases in recent <br />memory. (The city budget increased by 9.15% over two years, from 2004 to 2004, and this did not <br />keep pace with inflation and our growth.) <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is recommended that the City Council include in the 2005 budget the 7 full-time and 2 part-time <br />positions that were previously discussed and which are shown on the attachment. This includes the <br />community development director starting in July 2005. <br /> <br /> <br />