My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E-cigarettes: an evidence update <br /> <br />107 <br />Appendix C: Narrative summary of studies on nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes <br />Early studies <br />Two studies, both published in 2010, examined nicotine delivery from cigalike EC. <br /> <br />Bullen et al., 2010 used a cross-over design to compare nicotine delivery of a 16mg/ml <br />Ruyan V8 EC with a 0mg/ml EC, a nicotine inhalator (10mg) and a conventional <br />cigarette among 8 smokers who abstained from smoking overnight [43]. Participants <br />puffed on their cigarettes and EC ad libitum over 5 minutes, and on the inhalator over <br />20 minutes. The nicotine containing EC had similar pharmacokinetic parameters to the <br />inhalator (Cmax: 1.3 vs. 2.1 ng/ml; Tmax: 19.6 vs. 32.0 mins), and both were out- <br />performed by a conventional cigarette (Cmax 13.4 ng/ml; Tmax 14.3 mins). <br /> <br />Vansickel et al., 2010 also used a cross-over design and tested nicotine delivery of two <br />EC (NJOY EC (18mg) and Crown 7 EC (16mg) and participants own brand <br />cigarette[118]. Participants abstained overnight and then took 10 puffs on the EC with a <br />30 sec inter-puff interval. Only the conventional cigarette produced a significant rise in <br />plasma nicotine, from baseline 2.1 ng/ml (SD 0.32) to a peak at 5 minutes 18.8 ng/ml <br />(SD 11.8). <br /> <br />The poor nicotine delivery of these EC was likely to be due to several factors. The EC <br />tested were some of the first to market. The EC used in the Bullen 2010 study were <br />noted to leak and the vaporising component did not always function. Both of these early <br />studies recruited EC naïve smokers, without opportunity to practice using the EC prior <br />to experimentation. <br /> <br />There are other factors that are associated with nicotine delivery, which we have <br />summarised below. <br /> <br />1) More intensive vaping regimens <br />Vansickel et al., examined nicotine delivery associated with the use of Vapor King <br />(cigalike EC with 18mg/ml nicotine) in 20 smokers naïve to EC [119]. After overnight <br />abstinence, participants used the EC for 5 minutes on a total of six occasions (10 puffs, <br />30 sec inter-puff interval) 30 minutes apart. A significant increase in plasma nicotine <br />was observed after the fourth bout of puffing, and mean blood nicotine levels had <br />increased from 2.2 ng/ml (SD 0.78) at baseline to 7.4 ng/ml (SD 5.1) at the end of the <br />last bout of puffing. <br /> <br />2) Experience with EC <br />Vansickel & Eissenberg (2012) report nicotine pharmacokinetics in eight vapers who <br />had been using EC for average of 11.5 (SD 5.2) months [7]. They used their own EC <br />and e-liquid (the majority used an e-liquid with a concentration of 18 mg/ml).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.