My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E-cigarettes: an evidence update <br /> <br />79 <br />6.5–13mg/kg [69]). Accelerated weight loss, reduced immunity and early death in the <br />experimental group were much more likely the result of protracted stress and nicotine <br />poisoning than the result of exposure to free radicals (which were in any case 1 ,000 <br />times lower than from cigarettes). <br /> <br />A similar study from 2015 [134] reported oxidant reactivity (which is linked to free <br />radicals) of e-liquid and cytokine release in exposed lung tissue and in mice exposed to <br />EC vapour. Again, no comparison with exposure to smoke was reported. <br /> <br />Human studies do not corroborate any of the findings reported here. A case study of <br />lipoid pneumonia, which could have been caused by EC flavouring, received worldwide <br />attention in 2012 [142] but despite extensive interest in the phenomenon, no further <br />cases were published. Adverse effects of vaping are primarily local irritation and dry <br />mouth [132]. A study that monitored asthma patients who switched from smoking to <br />vaping found significant improvements in symptoms and in respiratory function [143]. <br />The recent Cochrane Review found no significant adverse effects associated with EC <br />use for up to 1.5 years [39]. <br /> <br />Summary <br />The mice model has little relevance for estimating human risk and it does not raise any <br />new safety concerns. <br /> <br />Particles in e-cigarette vapour <br />For completeness we are including information on another recent report which was <br />interpreted as showing that EC may be dangerous to bystanders. At an EC Summit <br />conference in London in November 2014, Harrison and McFiggans reported on particles <br />present in EC vapour. Their presentation was reported in the British Medical Journal <br />under the title “E-cigarette vapour could damage health of non-smokers” [137]. <br />McFiggans and Harrison requested a retraction of the piece because their findings did <br />not concern any health risks. It is the content of the particles rather than their presence <br />or size which has health implications [144]. <br /> <br />Impact of media reports that e-cigarettes are dangerous <br />Together with previous health scares, the articles reviewed here may be having a <br />significant impact on public perception of EC safety. In the US, 82% of responders <br />believed that vaping is safer than smoking in 2010, but the figure has shrunk to 51% in <br />2014 [65]. A perception that EC pose as much risk as smoking is the most likely <br />explanation of the recent decline in adoption of EC by smokers [145]. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.