My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E-cigarettes: an evidence update <br /> <br />78 <br />Although e-liquid can be heated to a temperature which leads to a release of aldehydes, <br />the resulting aerosol is aversive to vapers and so poses no health risk. <br /> <br />Summary <br />There is no indication that EC users are exposed to dangerous levels of aldehydes . <br /> <br />Effects of e-cigarette vapour on mice lungs <br />A paper published in February 2015 [135] generated worldwide media coverage with <br />claims that it linked EC to lung inflammation, lung infection, and even lung cancer. <br /> <br />Groups of mice were put in a small container exposing them to vapour from six EC <br />(‘Menthol Bold’ 1.8% nicotine) puffed on a rotating wheel at six puffs per minute for 1.5 <br />hours, twice daily, over two weeks. The control mice were not exposed to this t reatment. <br /> <br />Animals were infected with either streptococcus pneumonia via intranasal instillation <br />and killed 24 hours later, or with tissue culture influenza virus and monitored for weight <br />loss, mortality, and lung and airways inflammation. Compared to the control group, the <br />experimental animals had an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, diminished lung <br />glutathione levels, higher viral titre, and were more likely to lose weight and die. The <br />study identified free radicals in EC vapour as the potential culprit. <br /> <br />There are several problems with the study and with the way its results have been <br />interpreted. <br /> <br />EC vapour is inhaled as a replacement for tobacco smoke, but the study attempted no <br />comparison of the effects on the lungs from smoke and vapour exposures. This makes <br />a meaningful interpretation of the results difficult. A comparison was made, however, of <br />the levels of free radicals. Even at the very high vapour density generated by the study <br />procedure, the level of free radicals identified in vapour was “several orders of <br />magnitude lower than in cigarette smoke”. <br /> <br />In addition to this, the mice in the experimental group were exposed to a much higher <br />level of stress than the control group, and stress affects bacterial and viral response. <br />Long and repeated containment in the small and crowded smoke chamber emitting an <br />overpowering smell is a stressor in itself, but the animals also suffered repeated nicotine <br />poisoning. The mice showed an average cotinine concentration of 267ng/ml. Cotinine is <br />the primary metabolite of nicotine and in humans the amount of nicotine needed to give <br />similar cotinine levels are tolerated by heavy smokers, but highly aversive to non - <br />smokers, who would be expected to feel sick and vomit at this level of exposure. Mice <br />are much more sensitive to nicotine than humans (LD50 in mice is 3mg/kg, in hu mans
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.