Laserfiche WebLink
The City cannot land apply sludge between April and October due to regulations for highly <br />permeable soils. The sludge can be land applied if crops are to be planted within 14 days of <br />application, which typically does not occur in the fall. Therefore, other options were analyzed to <br />determine how the sludge could be removed if the digester was taken off line. <br /> <br />Plant staff and HRG have contacted Jorja DuFresne of the MPCA. The City basically has three <br />options as listed below. Each option has advantages and disadvantages. <br /> · Maintain operating conditions and hope that the cover is safe and that further structural <br /> damage does not occur. <br /> · Hire a contractor to set up at the plant site to remove the sludge from the storage tank <br /> and run it through a belt press. The City would then haul the dried sludge to a landfill. <br /> · Hire a contractor to haul the sludge to one of the Met Council treatment plants. <br /> <br />MAINTAIN OPERATING CONDITIONS <br />HRG recommends that the tank be taken out of service to provide operator safety and avoid <br />further structural damage. The cover seems to be stable at this point, but if pressure builds up <br />within the tank and causes the cover to move a substantial amount, further structural damage is <br />definite and would be extremely costly. The Contractor predicts a worse case scenario of <br />replacing the entire above grade portion of the concrete tank that is 12-inches thick. The below <br />grade portion of the tank is 18-inch thick and should not suffer as much damage. It is <br />recommended that the City review the two options below and take the primary digester out of <br />service as soon as possible. <br /> <br />LANDFILL <br />The City has contacted a contractor that can provide equipment on-site that would remove the <br />sludge from the storage tanks, run it through a belt filter press to dry the sludge, and the City <br />would haul the dried sludge to a landfill. The local landfill has been contacted to determine if <br />they would take the sludge. <br /> <br />The contractor stated that the sludge could be removed, dried, and hauled to the landfill at a <br />cost of $0.045/gallon. The contractor previously provided this service to the City of Owatonna, <br />MN. There would also be an additional chemical cost of $2,500 to assist in drying the sludge. <br />To remove the entire storage tank volume estimated at 520,000 gallons, the cost is estimated at <br />$23,500 + $2,500 = $26,000 or $0.05/gallon. <br /> <br />Landfill fees were based on two options. If the landfill can consider the dried sludge a cover, the <br />cost would be $12 per ton of solids. If the sludge is considered disposal, the cost would be $36 <br />per 18 cubic yards. The landfill decided that the sludge would be considered a cover material. <br /> <br />Sludge quantities were estimated assuming 520,000 gallons of wet sludge at 4.9% total solids. <br />It was assumed the sludge could be dried to 18% with the belt filter press and have a specific <br />gravity of 1.06. Based on approximately 620 tons of 18% solid sludge at $12 per ton, the cost <br />would be $7,500 or $0.015/gallon for a total of $0.065/gallon or $35,000. <br /> <br />The City has trucks available to haul dried sludge to the landfill. These costs are not included. <br /> <br />METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />The City has another option to haul liquid sludge from the storage tank to one of the Met Council <br />treatment facilities. HRG spoke with Leo Hermes the manager of the Industrial Waste <br /> <br />C:\Documents and Settings\jmiller. ELKRIVERPD\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK20\mem-071304- 2 <br />coverproblems 11 .doc <br /> <br /> <br />