5.5. SR 08-14-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'~'ublic notice an~ publicity Draft the Advanced Corridor Plan Submit the physical design component* of the Advanced Corridor Plan to the governing body -3o Days-I,~ of all cities, counties, and towns along the Corridor Each metropolitan planning organization reviews the Advanced Corridor Plan to determine if it's consistent with its Development Guide 60 Days Each metropolitan planning organization holds a hearing on the Advanced Corridor Plan If consistent, each metropolitan planning organization approves the Advanced Corridor Plan If inconsistent, each metropolitan planning organization submits proposed amendments to the Advanced Corridor Plan to make it consistent with the Development Guide * Physical De' '-n Component = i) location, length and termini of routes; ii) mainter v) related p, and ride, parking and other transportation facilities _._Summary of ~'~ roceedings and) testimony NGDA / Mn/DOT Public hearing on the physicalI design component of theI Advanced Corridor Plan I Cities, counties and / towns should review and comment on the Plan If disapprove, city or town must provide an amendment that, if adopted, would cause the city or town to withdraw it's disapproval. Cities and towns shall approve or disapprove of the location and design of the station to be located in the city or town. Revise Plan Submit revised Advanced Corridor Plan to each metropolitan planning organization** Draft Final Design Plan Incorporate proposed amendments into the Final Design Plan · e facility location; iii) safety improvements; iv) station location an( ';ign;