Laserfiche WebLink
• PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS <br /> The properties were surveyed and evaluated in accordance with the following <br /> requirements under Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (c) which <br /> states: <br /> Interior Inspection —"The municipality may not make such determination [that the <br /> building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..." <br /> Exterior Inspection and Other Means—"An interior inspection of the property is not <br /> required, if the municipality finds that (1)the municipality or authority is unable to gain <br /> access to the property; and after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party <br /> that owns or controls the property; and (2)the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable <br /> conclusion that the building is structurally substandard." <br /> Documentation— "Written documentation of the building findings and reasons why an <br /> interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, <br /> subdivision 3, clause (1)." <br /> PROCEDURES FOLLOWED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS <br /> The City of Eagan sent letters to all property owners and tenants located in the district <br /> requesting that an inspection and evaluation be made of their property. SEH canvassed <br /> the proposed area during a two-week period at the end of July, 2001. <br /> An interior inspection and evaluation was completed if consented to by the owner or <br /> owner's representative. An exterior inspection and evaluation was made of the property <br /> where either the owner refused interior access to their property or the scheduling of the <br /> evaluation was not able to be coordinated with the owner within the time given for the <br /> evaluations. <br /> For all subject buildings, the City of Eagan collected a listing of all available building <br /> permits on record, noting date issued and types of work completed for each permit. SEH <br /> reviewed this list as well as several actual permits for a sample of buildings. Additional <br /> building data was collected from public taxpayer information available from Dakota <br /> County. Building data from these public records was combined with and reviewed <br /> against information gathered in the field. <br /> QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS <br /> The properties were surveyed and evaluated to ascertain whether the qualification tests <br /> for tax increment eligibility for a redevelopment district,required under the following <br /> Minnesota Statutes,could be met. <br /> Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (a) (1) requires two tests for <br /> occupied parcels: <br /> 1. Coverage Test—"parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are <br /> . occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or similar <br /> structures . . ." <br /> 3 <br />