My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. HRSR 09-07-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09-07-2004
>
5.1. HRSR 09-07-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2015 3:36:22 PM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:25:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
9/7/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• City of Elk River <br /> Downtown Revitalization-Redevelopment Eligibility Assessments <br /> September 2, 2004 <br /> PURPOSE <br /> Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH)was hired by the City of Elk River, Elk River, <br /> Minnesota,to survey and evaluate certain the properties within the proposed"Downtown <br /> Revitalization"Tax Increment Financing District, and to amend it's original report dated <br /> August,2003. <br /> The proposed district is generally located south of U.S. Highway 10 between Jackson and <br /> County Road number 42. The purpose of our work was to independently ascertain <br /> whether the qualification tests for tax increment eligibility, as required under Minnesota <br /> Statute, could be met. <br /> The findings and conclusions drawn herein are solely for the purpose of tax increment <br /> eligibility and are not intended to be used outside the scope of this assessment. <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> The proposed district consists of 6 parcels comprised of the following types of <br /> improvements: 4 commercial or mixed-use structures on 3 parcels, 1 vacant parcels with <br /> parking or street improvements, 2 vacant parcels with no improvements and adjacent <br /> • Road Right of Way. Building assessment information and data was obtained from the <br /> July 2003 report. <br /> EVALUATIONS <br /> Both interior and exterior evaluations were completed for all the buildings. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Coverage Test—Four(4) of the six(6)properties met the coverage test resulting in the <br /> finding of 97.25%area coverage. This exceeds the 70%area coverage requirement. <br /> The Right of Way (ROW) area was not included for the coverage analysis. <br /> Condition of Buildings Test—One Hundred(100%) percent of the buildings—4 of the 4 <br /> buildings—were found to be"structurally substandard"when considering code <br /> deficiencies and other deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial <br /> renovation or clearance (see definition of"structurally substandard"as follows). This <br /> exceeds the Condition of Buildings Test whereby over 50%of buildings, not including <br /> outbuildings,must be found"structurally substandard." <br /> • <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.