Laserfiche WebLink
Comparison to these standards can only tell part of the story of the facilities system in Elk River. Other attributes such <br />as quality, size, accessibility, location, age, supporting amenities, and durability can be just as important. The most <br />important considerations when looking at facilities needs to be the local demand, appropriateness, and availability <br />of similar facilities. The standards do provide a good starting point for comparisons but cannot entirely represent the <br />needs of Elk River. <br />1 per 1,000 -2,000 <br />1 per 5,000 to 10,000 <br />(1/3-1/2 should be lit) <br />1 per 2,000 to 4,000 <br />1 per 4,000 to 8,000 <br />1 per 3,000 <br />1 per 10,000- 20,000 <br />(City only) <br />1 per 20,000 <br />1 per 5,000 to 10,000 <br />Dep. on demand <br />1 per 2,000 -4,000 <br />1 per 7,500- 10,000 <br />1 per 20,000- 40,000 <br />NA <br />2010 Facilities <br />Current <br />Minimum <br />Deficit/ <br />tandard (pop. <br />Surplus <br />22,974) <br />12 -23 <br />ok to low <br />3 -5 <br />6 -12 <br />3 -6 <br />8 <br />1 -2 <br />1 <br />3 -5 <br />6 -12 <br />2 -3 <br />1- <br />A to low <br />ok to high <br />03 <br />ok to high <br />low (partner) <br />low (partner) <br />ok <br />low (partner) <br />A <br />low (partner) <br />2035 Facilities <br />Minimum <br />Standard (pop. <br />34,890) <br />18 -36 <br />3 -7 <br />9 -18 <br />5 -9 <br />12 <br />2 -4 <br />2 <br />4 -7 <br />9 -18 <br />4 -5 <br />1 <br />2035 <br />Deficit/ <br />Surplus <br />low <br />A to low <br />A <br />low (partner) <br />A <br />low (partner) <br />low (partner) <br />ok to low <br />low (partner) <br />A <br />low (partner) <br />.. ...................................................... ............................... <br />Chapter 6: Implementation 80 <br />