Laserfiche WebLink
IV. <br /> <br />Design Standards <br /> <br />Street improvement design standards were adopted by the Elk River City Council on <br />March 6, 1989. These standards should remain valid, with correlations to the functional <br />classification system proposed in this report as follows: <br /> <br />Major arterials and a majority of minor arterials fall under the category of Federal, State, and <br />County Highways in the Street Improvements section of City of Elk River Design Standards. <br /> <br />It is unlikely that many of the county, roads that currently have a rural section will eventually <br />be redesigned with an urban section. In its review process, the City should make certain that <br />redesign is consistent with its transportation plan. Collectors in the transportation plan fall <br />under one of three categories: Municipal State Aid (MSA) Streets, Collector Streets, or <br />Commercial/Industrial Streets. Which category a particular street belongs in depends on its <br />designation for funding purposes (i.e. Municipal State Aid) and the zoning of the land <br />adjacent to its right-of-way. Local streets in the transportation plan are categorized as <br />Residential Sh-eets in the City of Elk River Design Standards. <br />In its designs the City should be conscious of transit and other modes of transportation. As <br />the City grows, transit in some form will become more appealing. Potential transit, track and <br />school bus routes should be considered when designing curb radii at intersections and other <br />channelization features. When acquiring right-of-way, the City should examine its policy <br />regarding sidewalks and bike paths, and provide adequate room for these facilities. <br /> <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br /> <br />The City of Elk River, by commissioning this transportation plan, has made a commitment <br />to the establishment and maintenance of a working transportation system well into the future. <br />In doing so, it promotes an environment for organized growth. In many ways, putting this <br />plan into effect is not a unilateral process, but rather a cooperative effort with other <br />jurisdictions, particularly Sherbume County and MnDOT. This section outlines a <br />recommended series of steps to implement the transportation plan. <br /> <br />Review and adopt the transportation plan. Adoption will establish guidelines for <br />improving existing transportation facilities and adding new ones. It will provide City <br />staff with an official reference to be used in review of development plans, to ensure <br />that they are consistent with long-range City planning. Contingency should be made <br />for changes to the plan resulting from a periodic review of assumptions, including <br />estimates of future development locations and densities, modal split, external growth <br />factors, trip generation rates, etc. <br /> <br />Protect right-of-way. From the transportation plan, the City should identify those <br />areas where right-of-way will need to be acquired. These corridors should be <br />protected until acquisition takes place. <br /> <br />Initiate jurisdictional realignment process. The City should review jurisdictional <br />responsibility of roads on the existing street network and identify those roads where <br />responsibility should change hands. Very generally, we recommend that the State <br />assume responsibility for major arterials, the County for minor arterials, and the City <br /> <br /> -34- 230-156-80 <br />CTP-230.156 <br /> <br /> <br />