My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. SR 04-26-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
04/26/2004 - SPECIAL
>
3.0. SR 04-26-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:30 AM
Creation date
4/23/2004 3:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transportation Plan Goals <br />A list of roadway improvement actions was developed for Elk River by examining the existing <br />and/or forecast traffic operations, safety, and functional class issues and deficiencies identified in <br />the previous chapters. Improvement actions were developed that are expected to alleviate these <br />issues and generally improve traffic mobility and safety. Table 10 describes the improvement <br />actions recommended and the objectives that each action is expected to achieve. <br /> <br />TABLE I <br />SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS <br /> <br />Roadway Improvement Action Recommendation Objective <br /> Work with Mn/DOT to implement improvements identified · Eliminate/reduce existing <br />TH 10 from east in TH 10 CMP or to develop a new improvement vehicle crashes and <br />city limits to west alternative(s). Likely improvement candidates include congestion. <br />city limits, conversion to 6-lane expressway or 4-lane freeway. A TH 10 · Eliminate/reduce future <br /> bypass is not a likely option, congestion. <br /> Work with Mn/DOT to implement improvements identified · Eliminate/reduce existing <br />TH 169 from north in TH 169 CMP or to develop a new improvement vehicle crashes and <br />city limits to south alternative(s). Likely improvement candidates include a 4-lane congestion. <br />city limits, freeway. A TH 169 bypass is apotentid option. Bypass may · Eliminate/reduce future <br /> join existing TH 169 alignment in northern Elk River. congestion. <br /> · Eliminate/reduce existing <br />CSAH 1 Expand roadway to a 4-lane divided arterial with right and left vehicle crashes. <br />(Proctor Ave) from turn lanes at key intersections. · Eliminate/reduce expected <br />CR 77 to TH 10 future congestion. <br />CSAH 13 Expand roadway and add right and left mm lanes at key <br />(Twin Lakes Rd) intersections. Number of additional lanes constructed may · Eliminate/reduce existing <br />from Twin Lakes vary depending on completion of adjacent roadway vehicle crashes and expected <br />Road to CR 31 improvements. Conduct a corridor study to specifically future congestion. <br />(Viking Blvd) determine what improvements should be implemented. <br /> Expand roadway and add right and left mm lanes at key <br />CR 31 intersections. Number of additional lanes constructed may <br />(Viking blvd) vary depending on planned improvements for continuation of · Eliminate/reduce expected <br />from CSAH 13 to roadway in Anoka County. Conduct a corridor study to future congestion. <br />east city limits specifically determine what improvements should be <br /> implemented. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.