My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-2014 CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-20-2014 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2014 11:19:57 AM
Creation date
12/2/2014 11:19:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
10/20/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />October 20, 2014 <br />Page 10 <br />Ms. Gardner explained the process for the wayfinding sign schedule was to first <br />determine a sign design and then further into the process was to specify the design <br />cost. She outlined things to consider, such as the land, landscaping, and electricity. <br />She explained the R.FP process for determining the costs for the signs and why the <br />cost could vary considerably. She noted this long -term plan wouldn't remove all the <br />signs at once but would replace them as needed or as budgeted. <br />Mayor Dietz stated his concerns with the hesitation to provide cost figures and felt <br />once the council approved a project design, there was a point of no return after <br />receiving those numbers. Mayor Dietz stated his priority was not to approve a <br />project based upon the public's opinion without reviewing the costs first. <br />Councilmember Motin stated his concerns with the sign design with the goal of <br />uniform signage and the regulatory sign requirements. He stated the monuments <br />were beautiful but without factoring in cost, it was difficult for him to approve a <br />project without addressing the sign layout. <br />Ms. Gardner explained how the process was laid out in another city and how she felt <br />it important that the sign design be decided before moving forward. She stated the <br />city may also have the ability to create some of these signs. <br />Councilmember Motin stated they've only received the design for the monument <br />signs and nothing has been presented to determine the uniformity of signs, what's <br />going to hold the signs, and where they'll be located. <br />Ms. Gardner stated Visual Communication would return with that information once <br />the initial design was chosen. <br />Councilmember Motin asked what more the consultant would be providing the city. <br />Ms. Gardner stated Visual Communications, once a design is chosen, will then create <br />all the sign designs and determine the location of those signs. She explained the <br />specs would then be created, breaking down each piece of the sign, and those specs <br />would then be available to allow for quotes. <br />Mr. Portner explained when the council went out for bids for a consultant, bids <br />came back with a wide spectrum of costs to determine the wayfinding signage <br />program, but each proposal may or may not have estimated pricing of sign design <br />and creation costs as it may have been part of the final bid. But the consultant's bid <br />chosen by the council was to provide a plan to determine an artist's conception that <br />took the themes of Elk River, and use these themes into a final design that everyone <br />agrees upon. Mr. Portner stated since monuments are the most public pieces of the <br />design, it's used to determine the final global plan which is a connection that ties all <br />these factors together. He stated the council could agree on Option 1, Option 2, or <br />go back to Visual Communications to have something different provided, or scrap it <br />all together. <br />0.I E R E l e Y <br />NATURE-) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.