My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (5 SETS) 12-01-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
12-01-2014
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (5 SETS) 12-01-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2014 11:21:21 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 11:17:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/1/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 4 <br /> November 3,2014 <br /> b. Pavers Donated <br /> c. Demo and aggregate base To be determined <br /> d. Installation Donated <br /> Option 2—Pavers in the crosswalk,portions of the alley with asphalt midway <br /> ■ Crosswalk Pavers <br /> ■ Upper Alley Pavers <br /> ■ Lower Alley Pavers <br /> ■ Alley Midsection in Asphalt <br /> a. Engineering Services for design $28,080 <br /> b. Pavers Donated <br /> c. Demo and aggregate base To be determined <br /> d. Asphalt midsection $9,400 <br /> Option 3—Pavers at crosswalk and asphalt alley <br /> ■ Pavers at crosswalk Donated <br /> o Demo and aggregate base To be determined <br /> ■ Asphalt alley $22,500 <br /> ■ Downtown beautification goal not supported <br /> ■ Reduced life expectancy (asphalt vs. pavers) <br /> ■ Reduced stormwater runoff control <br /> Option 4—Asphalt crosswalk and alley <br /> • Crosswalk $6,000 <br /> • Alley 22,500 <br /> ■ Downtown beautification goal not supported <br /> ■ Reduced life expectancy <br /> ■ No stormwater runoff control <br /> She stated there was a 5"' option discussed,which was closing the alley and expanding the <br /> park. She stated this option was discarded, as it was suggested the access was necessary for <br /> fire-fighting purposes and had discussion with Chief Cunningham to clarify. Ms. Fischer <br /> stated she will pursue Clean Water Act funds in 2015 for future projects,but those funds <br /> would not be available until 2016. <br /> Mayor Dietz asked if staff had looked at stamped concrete. He stated installation of <br /> concrete would be less costly. Councilmember Wilson stated they have tried stamped <br /> concrete in the past,but the product deteriorated badly, especially the color. Mr. Hecker <br /> stated that Rodney Schreifels, of his staff,was not in favor of concrete. Mayor Dietz stated <br /> there have been a lot of advancements in concrete since the time of the early installation, <br /> and they are able to mix the color more thoroughly. <br /> Councilmember Westgaard stated concrete would have a longer life. He asked if all the <br /> pavers needed to be replaced, or if they could just replace the bad areas. Ms. Fischer <br /> stated the representative from Borgert Products felt the entire batch was inferior. She <br /> noted the pavers should have a 25-year life. Councilmember Westgaard asked why the <br /> base needed to be redone. Mark Thompson, Street Superintendent, stated staffs <br /> P 0 W I R I D 9 Y <br /> 1`4M UREJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.