My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 11-03-2014 (2 SETS)
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
11-03-2014
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 11-03-2014 (2 SETS)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2014 11:27:44 AM
Creation date
10/31/2014 9:03:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/3/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 10 <br /> October 6,2014 <br /> Mr. Barnhart stated there are issues with this process and noted the reason the city <br /> has a fee set is to avoid having to do appraisals. <br /> Mayor Dietz stated concerns with the public perceiving the city is changing these <br /> fees for its own benefit because of the Nature's Edge Business Park project. <br /> Attorney Beck stated he disagrees with Mr. Barnhart's analysis of the park dedication <br /> fees but noted the ordinance does need updating. He stated he doesn't see a need to <br /> make changes before the Parks Master plan is completed. He explained the history <br /> behind the 10%requirement and noted there is no language about the fee in state <br /> law. <br /> Attorney Beck suggested continuing with the park dedication fees as is, but noted if a <br /> developer came in before the Parks Master Plan analysis was completed,the <br /> developer could present information on the value of their property,their impact on <br /> the park needs, and the amount of the fee could be discussed. <br /> Mayor Dietz concurred with Attorney Beck and would like to wait until the Parks <br /> Master Plan is completed. <br /> Councilmember Westgaard concurred. <br /> Councilmember Motin stated his hope is the final plan wouldn't be based on a fee on <br /> the bare acres but rather on the actual density impact of a project. <br /> Council consensus was to take no action on this item. <br /> 8.6 Discuss Worksession Items <br /> Mr. Portner presented the staff report. He noted an item not in the staff report <br /> regarding a discussion of the definition of single-family housing. <br /> Councilmember Motin stated he brought this request forward due to an incident he <br /> was contacted on and questioned the Council as to what is intended for single-family <br /> housing, enforcement, etc. <br /> Mr. Portner further noted his performance evaluation is scheduled for October 20, <br /> 2014. <br /> 9. Council Liaison Updates <br /> The Council provided updates on various commissions activities. <br /> P O W E R E D 0 Y <br /> 1`4 U <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.