My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1. SR 06-16-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
06-16-2014
>
9.1. SR 06-16-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 7:44:30 AM
Creation date
6/13/2014 11:16:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/16/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pinewood Golf Course <br /> May 17, 2014 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 6. How do the expenses for the last two years of the golf course compare to the total <br /> expenses of the course? <br /> 7. Who initiated the process to not make the final balloon payment? <br /> 8. Does the city have the money to make the final balloon payment? <br /> 9. What were the city's alternative plans for the golf course if it did not meet these <br /> financial expectations? <br /> 10. Does the forfeit of the balloon payment have anything to do with saving for future <br /> projects? <br /> 11. If the city forfeits the golf course,will the purchase money need to be repaid to the park <br /> dedication fund? If so,will this money also need to come out of the taxpayer's pockets? <br /> 12. What effect will this have on the city's bond/credit rating? <br /> Future Intentions: <br /> 13. Why did the City enter into the purchase of the golf course? What were their <br /> intentions? <br /> 14. Did the current city council have any intention of continuing Pinewood Golf Course after <br /> the Contract for Deed expired? <br /> 15. What are the realistic conditions the city would consider before re-opening the golf <br /> course? <br /> 16. Has any thought been given to other alternatives available to make the park more <br /> financially attractive (better local advertising,community events like Easter Egg hunts, <br /> Halloween activities,etc.). <br /> 17. How soon would the clubhouse and irrigation system need to be replaced? Is there an <br /> alternative to a 2 million dollar clubhouse? <br /> 18. Realistically, city parks and activities are not profitable;they are an intrinsic reward. Has <br /> city council, behind closed doors or in secret, decided to close other parks and amenities <br /> (i.e. Lake Orono, hockey arena expenses, library expenses,softball, baseball, senior <br /> citizen center,etc.)? If so,why not? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.