My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1. SR 06-16-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
06-16-2014
>
9.1. SR 06-16-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 7:44:30 AM
Creation date
6/13/2014 11:16:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/16/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r- <br /> Peter Kimball <br /> 14357 190i1' Ave NW <br /> Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> May 17, 2014 <br /> Elk River <br /> Pinewood Golf Course <br /> To Whom It May Concern: <br /> We, citizens of Elk River, a city where town and country meet,believe in the vision of <br /> Elk River: to promote a lifestyle in an innovative and involved community offering <br /> unlimited opportunities. We believe in maintaining resources that provide long-term <br /> contributions for the growth and well-being of its citizens. <br /> These core values are encompassed in a small plot of land in Elk River called the <br /> Pinewood Golf Course. Historically,members of the community, as young as 4 and as <br /> old as 99, have regularly enjoyed this city amenity_ <br /> Eight years from the original purchase and after spending a million dollars in tax payers' <br /> money, residents have been(poorly) informed--without warning and after secret meetings <br /> held without the benefit of public discussion-- that the course will not open in 2014. <br /> Citizens are disappointed to discover that the City, which represents them, has breached a <br /> contract in an unethical manner that would be prohibited by most individual's core moral <br /> values. <br /> As a result, the citizens are requesting answers from City Council regarding the actions <br /> taken concerning this city park. <br /> Litigation Questions: <br /> 1. What litigation result is City Council hoping to see? <br /> 2. Why wasn't the community asked to help make the decision? What was the rationale <br /> behind using closed door meetings and leaving the community uninformed until it was <br /> too late? <br /> 3. How does the city justify collecting revenue in 2013 if, in April before the golf season, <br /> there was never any intention to pay the bill? <br /> Budget (questions: <br /> 4. In the last five years,which city parks/recreation facilities have consistently lost money? <br /> S. What has been the`real'cost of operating Pinewood (outside of interest and principle)? <br /> What portion of these expenses are longterm purchases (i.e. new golf carts)? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.