Laserfiche WebLink
C of <br /> Rive,�._r Request for Action <br /> To Item Number <br /> Planning Commission 5.4 <br /> Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br /> Planning Items May 27,2014 Zack Carlton,Planner I <br /> Item Description Reviewed by <br /> Request by Source Land Capital for a concept Jeremy Barnhart,Deputy Director, CODD <br /> review of a proposed re-plat in the River Park <br /> development Reviewed by <br /> Action Requested <br /> Provide informal,nonbinding feedback on the proposed re-plat of nine townhome lots, 48 units,to <br /> approximately 17 single-family lots. <br /> Background/Discussion <br /> The River Park plat was approved in 2005 and included 80 townhome units and 36 single-family lots. To <br /> date, 32 townhome units and 23 single family homes have been constructed. Single-family lots have <br /> become more marketable,and the applicant is proposing to re-plat the remaining nine lots to <br /> accommodate approximately 17 single-family lots. <br /> Analysis <br /> Plat <br /> There are two oudots,outlots B &C, that cover portions of two of the shared drives serving existing <br /> townhomes. These oudots should be removed and included in the adjacent townhome parcels, ensuring <br /> the driveways remain under common ownership. <br /> Required wetland setbacks and drainage easements will need to be included on the proposed single-family <br /> lots. Property line adjustments will require easement vacations. <br /> The lots vary in size from 69.5'wide to 99.7'wide and the proposed lots are consistent with the <br /> neighborhood character and the approved PUD. <br /> Utilities <br /> Staff received a letter from Centerpoint Energy objecting to the proposed plat. They have existing lines <br /> and easements that would need to be relocated or abandoned. Centerpoint requests that the applicant <br /> reimburse them for the cost of relocating the existing gas lines. Impacts and costs associated with moving <br /> utilities will be the developer's responsibility and should be coordinated with the appropriate agency as <br /> needed. This response is similar to the Kliever Lake Fields 4th addition project that was approved in <br /> 2013. <br /> The developer and ERMU continue to evaluate utility service requirements. <br /> Template Updated 4/14 1AXTWSRE <br />