My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.10. SR 02-23-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
02/23/2004
>
5.10. SR 02-23-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:26 AM
Creation date
3/5/2004 3:19:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Howard R. Green Company Feasibility Study <br />Project No. 822530-0030 Yankton Street Road Improvements <br /> Elk River, MN <br /> projects of similar scope. Project cost estimates provided reflect the estimated <br /> construction cost, which includes contractor costs for labor, equipment and <br /> materials. <br /> <br />IX. Financing <br /> <br />There are total of eleven properties that abut Yankton Street. Three of these <br />properties, however, do not have access directly onto Yankton Street, but rather <br />access onto Zebulon Street and 201st Avenue. The frontage of the 11 properties <br />along Yankton Street ranges from a Iow of 112 lineal feet to a high of 611 lineal <br />feet. <br /> <br />There are typically two ways to assess these types of road reconstruction <br />improvements. Most recently, the City Council has utilized a per residential <br />equivalent unit assessment. The rational for utilizing residential equivalent units <br />for the assessment method is an attempt to treat all homeowners the same <br /> <br />regardless of how much frontage they have <br />The other method of assessing these <br />footage basis. According to the :y's <br />time to time establishes a per front <br />projects. The most recent rate was <br />foot. Given the minimum and <br />method of assessment, the <br />to a high of $25,600. It is <br />appeal at this hi( <br /> <br /> the reconstructed roadway. <br /> )rovements would be on a front <br /> policy, the City Council from <br /> ~ent rate for reconstruction <br /> in June 2001 at $42 per front <br /> footages and using a per front foot <br />ares would range from a Iow of $4,700 <br />that the City could sustain an assessment <br /> <br />If it is assumed that the ¢ uitable way to assess this project would be on a <br />residential equivalent unit basis and assumed that there are 11 residential units, <br />the question then is what is the maximum assessment amount that could be <br />sustained against an assessment appeal. If we assume that that number is up to <br />$10,000 per unit, which is likely on the high end, that would mean that there is <br />$110,000 generated by assessments. This would leave approximately $150,000 <br />of the project cost to be funded by the City. <br /> <br />X. Summary <br /> <br />The proposed street improvements will provide residents with a safe and <br />adequate public transportation system. The street reconstruction portion of this <br />project is feasible from an engineering standpoint, and with the exception of the <br />reduced street width, it meets all standards set forth by the City of Elk River. <br /> <br />The total project cost for the Yankton Street Improvements project is estimated to <br />be $ 260,650. The project would be funded through a mixture of special <br />assessments to the benefited properties and City funds. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.