My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. ERMUSR 03-18-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2014
>
03-18-2014
>
6.1. ERMUSR 03-18-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 2:03:31 PM
Creation date
3/14/2014 4:19:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/18/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br /> TO: FROM: <br /> Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Theresa Slominski—Finance and Office Manager <br /> John Dietz—Chair <br /> Al Nadeau—Vice Chair <br /> Daryl Thompson —Trustee <br /> MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br /> March 18, 2014 6.1b <br /> SUBJECT: <br /> Staff Update <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> We had 2,271 credit card payment transactions in February, compared to 2,347 in January. The <br /> fee for December should be$5,109.75. <br /> We received a PCA charge of$269,812.29 for February's billing. The PCA was a result of <br /> January's energy purchases and was justified to me via the explanation below from GRE's <br /> president: <br /> January was an unusual month. In terms of heating degree days, it was the 17th coldest in Minnesota over <br /> the past 142 years. GRE's energy load was 5.3 percent over budget and 6.7 percent over 2013, and <br /> coincided with fuel supply constraints and volatile energy prices across the country. Frigid sustained <br /> temperatures.propane shortages, and high gas prices(due in part to a pipeline fire)were major reasons <br /> for extreme and unanticipated price volatility in MISO. <br /> In January, we paid significantly more for energy purchased than the revenue received for the energy we <br /> generated and sold In short, we had high load and paid high prices for that load This was the major <br /> reason for the PCA. <br /> This leaves us with a balance of$367,995.68 accumulated PCA from January and February. We <br /> will continue to monitor the PCA balance to determine if charges will need to be passed along to <br /> our customers. <br /> The auditors were here February 27ih and 28th for field work and all went pretty well. The <br /> auditors are anticipating presenting the audit at the April 8th Commission Meeting. <br /> We are preparing for our first site visit from NISC March 31" through April 4th for the business <br /> practices analysis component related to the software conversion for the accounting side. We <br /> have a document to complete prior to their arrival that is a series of questions on how we <br /> currently complete tasks. After this site visit, the next step will be to send current data from our <br /> software to NISC to begin the actual data conversion. <br /> .$ Page 1 of 1 INATURE <br /> Reliable(Provider <br /> P owexeo To SeFIVE <br /> 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.