Laserfiche WebLink
City of Elk River, Minnesota <br />Preliminary Financial Analysis of Blackhawk Woods TIF Application <br />10/03/2013 <br />Page 9 <br />1.0 as a measure of cushion in the vent actual revenues and expenses are different than projected, In this case the <br />Developer indicated a need to meet or exceed a DCR of 1,15, Our pro forma calculation, which included slightly <br />revised TIF projections from the Developer, resulted in a stabilized DCR of 1.19 with assistance and 0.98 without <br />assistance. <br />In order to understand the sensitivity of the DCR to changes in project assumptions we analyze the amount by which <br />project costs and operating income would have to change in order for the project to have a feasible DCR. In regards <br />to project costs, the development would need to realize either a project costs savings of approximately 10% or <br />conversely the Developer would need to increase their equity investment into the project by approximately 10% of the <br />total development cost. In regards to net operating income, the project would need to realize an increase in operating <br />revenue of 17% to be feasible without assistance. Based on this analysis, it could be stated the Developer would be <br />unlikely to undertake this project, as proposed, "but -for" the provision of the Tax Increment assistance as requested, <br />The return analysis outline above is based on the Developer's request for a 25 -year TIF reimbursement term, as this <br />would represent the maximum potential return to the Developer as a result of TIF assistance. The Developer did <br />perform a calculation on the impact of the receipt of TIF over a shorter 15 -year period. If the TIF were to be received <br />over a shorter period, the Developer indicated the revenue would be capable of supporting a reduced TIF mortgage <br />amount of $730,734, while maintaining a desirable DCR. However, a reduced TIF term would decrease the potential <br />borrowing capacity of the revenue stream and result in a decrease of $266,137 from available financing. As a result <br />of the shorter term, the Developer would be required to increase their equity investment in the project by the <br />$266,137 amount and /or defer payment on their Developer Fee. <br />Conclusion <br />Should the developer receive TIF assistance, it would be required to reserve at least 20% of the units for persons of <br />low and moderate income for the term of the TIF assistance. When the TIF assistance has been completely repaid, <br />the developer will be under no obligation to continue reserving affordable housing units, As a result, the projected <br />time frame for the repayment of the TIF assistance should be considered when determining the assistance amount. <br />The developer has requested TIF assistance of $996,871 as necessary to attract additional equity to assist with <br />project feasibility due to reduced operating revenues resulting from the affordable housing units, Current revenues <br />projections indicate that with a 0% market value inflator, it would take approximately 23 years of the TIF District to <br />repay the TIF Note assuming a 4.70% interest rate. Assuming all other variables remain constant, an increase in the <br />market value inflator would result in increased revenues, potentially decreasing the repayment term. As indicated <br />previously, once the note is repaid the developer will be under no obligation to continue providing affordable housing <br />units. <br />The developer has indicated that the assistance is necessary for the project to proceed as proposed, The developer <br />would use the pay -as- you -go note assistance to finance the additional debt required to fund the initial projects that <br />cannot be supported due to the reduction in operating revenues from the affordable units. As we had indicated earlier <br />