My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. SR 11-16-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1998
>
11/16/1998
>
5.3. SR 11-16-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:24 AM
Creation date
2/6/2004 5:20:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT IMPLEMENTATION/BUSINESS PLAN <br />Working Paper of September 30, 1998 -- Page 2 <br /> <br />The initial discussion analyzes this system as a whole. Throughout this paper, however, <br />the downtown connector, Route T, will- not be treated on a stand-alone basis. Instead, all of <br />its capital costs, passenger projections, and operating expenses are factored into the radial <br />routes being analyzed for implementation. This is because all of the Phase II work has <br />been predicated on through-routing of commuter service from each of ihe line end points to <br />the first downtown station and on to the second central business district. <br /> <br />After examining the full route structure as a single large-scale project, each of the route <br />evaluations is summarized in matrix form and in accordance with criteria developed <br />earlier. It is possible to consider an initial implementation program of routes that rank <br />highly and work well together, or that consists of routes that initially may not be built to <br />their ultimate destinations in the first project stage due to ridership and investment <br />considerations. <br /> <br />The all-route, full-length system would require an initial capital outlay of $1.121 billion, <br />expressed in today's 1998 dollars. This study has established the year 2003 as the peak <br />construction period. Capital dollars are therefore most appropriately expressed on an <br />inflated basis for the year 2003; the $1.121 billion of 1998 becomes $1.364 billion five <br />years later. In this paper, only the first displays of capital costs show 1998 dollars, as a <br />point of reference for readers today. All subsequent dollar amounts are displayed in 2003 <br />values for capital construction, and in 2005 values for operations and maintenance, the first <br />full year of service. <br /> <br />The order of magnitude to construct the entire system at one time is substantial, at nearly <br />$1.4 billion. Therefore, this paper will recommend a "First Tier" program of <br />approximately half that size, consisting of Routes B, L and N, together with T and some <br />modifications, totaling $ 655 million in 2003 dollars. This would require approximately <br />$ 74 million of combined annual capital and operatingfimding, as morefidly set out in <br />Sections 3 and 4 of this paper. <br /> <br />Once a First Tier program has been constructed and in fidl revenue service for three <br />years, the routes and segments not yet built should be re-examined. Based on specific <br />criteria for the new additions, together with operating results available from the First Tier, <br />that examination should consist o fan evaluation process to determine which of the unbuilt <br />sections would be best suited for staging at what points in time. <br /> <br />This Implementation/Business Plan Paper focuses on the First Tier development <br />recommendation, to begin full operation by January, 2005. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.