Laserfiche WebLink
Great River Energy <br /> December 6,2013 <br /> Page 3 <br /> spending does not reflect any EUI spending. The Department is supportive of EUI projects that increase <br /> generation and distribution efficiencies and appreciates that utilities are reporting information about these <br /> investments through ESP®. Department Staff will work with Energy Platforms in the future to develop <br /> functionality to clearly display EUI investments separately from CIP eligible spending within ESP®. <br /> A summary of Great River Energy's investments by member are as follows: <br /> Member Utility 2012 Total 2012 Total 2012 LI 2012 LI EUI <br /> Spending(8) Spending(%) Spending($) Spending(%) Spending($) <br /> Agralite $596,501 3.5% $16,938 0.2% $0 <br /> Arrowhead $109,905 1.5% $16,935 0.3% $0 <br /> BENCO $574,058 2.1% $44,676 0.2% $0 <br /> Brown Co $159,077 1.3% $15,043 0.2% $0 <br /> Connexus $3,072,928 1.5% $293,385 0.2% $0 <br /> Cooperative $125,988 1.3% $15,487 0.3% $0 <br /> Crow Wing $382,043 0.7% $35,937 0.1% $0 <br /> Dakota $3,809,219 - 2.1% $315,638 0.3% $0 <br /> East Central $1,819,728 1.8% $115,507 0.2% $0 <br /> Elk River $388,567 1.5% $24,128 0.3% $0 <br /> Federated $210,172 0.8% $5,802 0.1% $0 <br /> Goodhue $229,822 2.3% $10,927 0.1% $0 <br /> Great River Energy $3 0.0% $0 0.0% $1 <br /> Itasca Mantrap $317,609 1.7% $19,030 0.2% $0 <br /> Kandiyohi $303,125 1.8% $33,703 0.3% $0 <br /> Lake Country $1,224,614 1.7% $100,720 0.2% $0 <br /> Lake Region $700,799 1.7% $47,655 0.1% $0 <br /> McLeod $388,964 2.3% $24,773 0.2% $0 <br /> Meeker $321,302 1.8% $7,072 0.0% $0 <br /> Mille Lacs $407,337 1.9% $63,277 0.4% $0 <br /> Minnesota Valley $1,254,068 2.0% $92,091 0 <br /> 0.2/0 $0 <br /> Nobles $142,079 1.1% $29,594 ; 0,3% $0 <br /> North Itasca $102,767 1.5% $11,103 0.2% $0 <br /> Redwood $47,277 0.6% $6,254 0.1% $0 <br /> Runestone $447,940 2.0% $32,141 0.2% $0 <br /> - <br /> South Central $137,605 0.9% $6,568 0.1% $0 <br /> Stearns $886,631 2.0% $91,100 0.4% $0 <br /> Steele Waseca $681,505 2.9% $9,812 0.1% $0 <br /> Todd Wadena $350,065 2.4% $3,485 0.0% $0 <br /> Wright-Hennepin $1,136,177 1.5% $121,146 0.2% $0 <br /> TOTAL $20,327,872 1.7% $1,609,928 0.2% $1 <br /> 6 Minn. Stat.§216B.241 subd. lc(d)allows a utility or associated to include in its energy conservation plan energy <br /> savings from electric utility infrastructure projects. <br /> r Minn. Stat.§216B.241 subd. lb(b)requires each electric cooperative association and electric municipal utility to <br /> spend 1.5%of gross operating revenues annually on energy conservation improvements. Minn.Stat. §216B.241 <br /> subd. 1(e)specifically excludes electric utility infrastructure projects from the definition of energy conservation <br /> improvements. <br /> 91 <br />