|
Great River Energy
<br /> December 6, 2013
<br /> Page 2
<br /> Crow Wing 3,772,583 0.7%
<br /> Dakota 20,660,472 1.1%
<br /> East Central 7,183,873 0.8%
<br /> Elk River 2,880,635 1.2%
<br /> Federated 1,130,165 0.4%
<br /> Goodhue 557,615 0.6%
<br /> Great River Energy(EUI&Load Mgmt) 20,266,522 NA
<br /> Itasca Mantrap 1,872,014 0.9%
<br /> Kandiyohi 1,533,314 1.0%
<br /> Lake Country 6,607,910 1.0%
<br /> Lake Region 2,592,440 0.6%
<br /> McLeod 1,056,352 0.6%
<br /> Meeker 942,916 0.6%
<br /> Mille Lacs 2,011,177 1.0%
<br /> Minnesota Valley 7,264,760 1.1%
<br /> Nobles 1,448,121 0.9%
<br /> North Itasca 470,503 0.9%
<br /> Redwood 132,729 0.2%
<br /> Runestone 1,691,298 0.8%
<br /> South Central 1,598,703 0.9%
<br /> Steams 5,334,299 1.1%
<br /> Steele Waseca 1,469,729 0.6%
<br /> Todd Wadena 945,013 0.6%
<br /> Wright-Hennepin 4,865,842 0.6%
<br /> TOTAL 127,028,666 1.1%
<br /> 2012 SPENDING REPORTED
<br /> Each electric utility is required to invest a minimum of 1.5 percent of its Minnesota gross operating
<br /> revenues(GOR)on CIP.4
<br /> For 2012,2010 revenues were the baseline for establishing these minimum spending requirements.
<br /> Based on the information you provided,Great River Energy's members invested a total of$20,327,872 in
<br /> 2012,approximately 1.7 percent of 2010 GOR.
<br /> Additionally,Minnesota Statutes require each electric utility to invest a minimum of 0.2 percent of its
<br /> residential Minnesota GOR on CTPprograms that directly serve the needs of low-income persons,
<br /> including renters.5 Each member utility is responsible for meeting the low-income spending requirement.
<br /> While utilities may claim energy savings that result from EUI projects,'Minnesota Statutes do not allow
<br /> the spending on EUI projects to count towards the C1P spending requirement.' Therefore,total 2012 CIF'
<br /> 4 See Minn.Stat. §216B.241 subd. la(2).
<br /> 5 See Minn.Stat. §216B.241 subd.7(a)and(c).
<br /> 90
<br />
|