Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />NCDA Board Members <br /> <br />Commissioner Duane Grandy <br /> <br />December 18, 2003 <br /> <br />Northstar Project Update <br /> <br />As you know, we have spent the last six months working to address key issues <br />identified by the FTA, Governor Pawlenty and key legislators in regard to the Northstar <br />project prior to the 2004 legislative session. Governor Pawlenty has indicated he will <br />use the FTA's evaluation as a critical factor in his decision whether to recommend <br />Northstar in his 2004 bonding bill. <br /> <br />We have recently received new information on both the ridership projections and the <br />analysis based on the rigorous new FTA standards from the transportation consultant, <br />AECOM Consult Inc. I should tell you that AECOM is a nationally respected consulting <br />firm on transit issues. <br /> <br />The results of AECOM's analysis are summarized below. Let me assure you that NO <br />formal decision on the configuration of the Northstar line will be made until board <br />members have had an opportunity to digest this information and discuss it with each <br />other. <br /> <br />New FTA Evaluation <br />The FTA has adopted a new method for evaluating transit projects seeking federal New <br />Starts funding. The FTA is requiring new starts projects to be evaluated against a cost-' <br />effectiveness index to determine the cost-effectiveness of a project. This index <br />compares the annualized costs for construction and operation of proposed systems with <br />the potential hours of commuting time saved each year by system users. <br /> <br />The preliminary analysis submitted to the FTA shows that a modified (shorter) Northstar <br />project is likely to meet the rigorous cost-effectiveness test. The Big Lake-to- <br />Minneapolis portion of the proposal appears to meet the FTA's requirements, but the full <br />extension of the line to St. Cloud/Rice apparently falls short of this standard. In addition, <br />some stations on the route may need to be removed from the project to meet the FTA <br />standard. <br /> <br />This rigorous standard is being applied to transit projects throughout the United States, <br />many of which are struggling to meet the FTA's stringent requirements. We are told <br />there are other projects around the country that will not meet the new FTA cost- <br />effectiveness index, regardless of how the project is configured, even though the project <br />might have met earlier evaluations. Fortunately, a modified Northstar route appears to <br />meet the requirement. <br /> <br /> <br />