My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. & 5.3. SR 06-24-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
06/24/2002
>
5.2. & 5.3. SR 06-24-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:50 AM
Creation date
6/24/2002 3:51:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/24/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
With the City Hall facility, it is recommended that the project move forward as designed. <br />The City will have to use some internal loans in order to make the project cash flow. The <br />City will also have to make sure that other reserve funds are available in case the government <br />building reserve funds are not received as projected. With the City Hall project the addition <br />besides shared space and basement space has been the new roof on the existing facility and <br />this would need to be done regardless of any remodeling or expansion. (There is also a metal <br />roof versus a shingle roof issue that can save the City $25,000. This is substantially less than <br />the $50,000 original estimate that was the difference between the metal and the shingles. A <br />number of locations for metal roof examples will be available Monday evening and the City <br />Council to take a look at these buildings prior to the July 8 meeting when bids are awarded. <br />The life span of a metal roof is substantially longer than the shingle roof and would pay for <br />itself over time, providing that the appearance is acceptable.) <br /> <br />At this point, information is being provided to the City Council as an update on the status of <br />the project. Staff needs Council feedback mainly on the Geothermal component of the <br />project. If the Geothermal component is to be removed, time is of the essence in order to <br />rebid this part of the project and have the endre project move forward in a timely fashion. <br />We can wait until July 8 to make a decision on the upstairs of the Public Safety facility but if <br />the Council knows which direction they want to take on this issue, then feedback on this <br />component would help. <br /> <br />s:~council~pat~ch-ps bids6-24.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.