My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. & 5.3. SR 06-24-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
06/24/2002
>
5.2. & 5.3. SR 06-24-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:50 AM
Creation date
6/24/2002 3:51:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/24/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Another consideration to add money to the project would be to use reserve funds. Finding <br />approximately $100,000 would be a challenge but could be done. The hope would be that all <br />of the building construction contingency will not be needed and, therefore, that these other <br />reserve funds will not be needed for the project. <br /> <br />Altogether the above figures for removal of' the Geothermal ($250,000), removal ore the <br />upstairs shell ($165,000), adding contingency funds ($25,000) and adding reserve funds <br />($100,000), gets us to $540,000 in adjustments. This is close to the $620,000 figure we are <br />currently estimating as our shortage for the public safety building. It should be noted that <br />with these adjustments the Police Department is still not getting its key component added to <br />the project. This key component is the six additional garage spots at a cost of approximately <br />$80,000. The police have indicated their desire to have this as part of the project from very <br />early on, going back to the first meetings at the City Council level on the proposal in <br />November and December 2001. <br /> <br />City Hall <br />In January the City Hall facility (construction timetable from 6/03 to 5/04) was estimated in <br />the $2.7 - $2.8 million range. The source of funds for this project is the government building <br />reserve. The government building reserve receives its money from the landfill surcharge. It <br />was (and still is) estimated that the government building reserve will have approximately $2.8 <br />million in early 2004, with about another $500,000 being available by the end of 2004. This <br />assumes that revenues continue to be received at the same pace for the next few years as <br />what we experienced in 2000 and 2001. <br /> <br />Since January the City Hall project has expanded in the amount of space being shared with <br />Utilities and in taking ownership of part of the basement beneath the Utilities building. <br />These additions plus the recent decision to have the mechanical and heating controlled by a <br />digital system pushed the City Hall project to slightly over $3 million. Finally, a new roof <br />system for the existing facility was recommended due to the ongoing problems with the <br />current roof plus the expected life cycle of the roof was to be ending within a few years. The <br />estimate for the roof was just under $150,000 but it now has become clear that additional <br />work to the structure of the roof needs to take place and the new estimate for the roof <br />project is in the $250 - 300,000 range. This new roof, regardless of any other remodeling or <br />expansion project, would need to take place. <br /> <br />Overall, there is generally less of a concern about the City Hall project budget as compared <br />to the Public Safety project budget. This is due to the limited amount of funds that are <br />available for the Public Safety project versus the use of reserves for the City Hall project. <br />However, if the landfill revenues going into the government building reserve were to slow <br />down or stop then alternative funding sources need to be identified for the City Hall project. <br />The slowing down of revenues is possible but having the funds stop altogether for an <br />extended period of time seems unlikely. The best reserve option available to the city is the <br />NSP reserve. An alternative is to use some street reserves but these reserves are planned to <br />be used for the street replacement program. A last resort alternative is the general fund cash <br />flow reserves. If everything comes together without interruption then the entire City Hall <br />project should be able to be funded by the end of 2004 with only some internal loans for 10 <br />months being necessary. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.