My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.9. SR 06-17-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
06/17/2002
>
6.9. SR 06-17-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:49 AM
Creation date
6/14/2002 8:59:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/17/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Mayor and City Council/P 02-05 <br />June 17, 2002 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />The proposed grading will result in the removal of all the trees on the site. The subdivision <br />ordinance states that trees should be preserved to the maximum extent possible; staff does <br />not feel that that the proposed plat accomplishes this. The applicant should revise the <br />grading plan or the layout of the plat in order to preserve existing vegetation on the site. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Meeting <br /> <br />At the Planning Commission meeting held on May 28th seven residents spoke. All seven <br />spoke against the proposed rezoning. Their comments were not directed toward the merits <br />of the preliminary plat. They felt that because of the wetlands, trees, slopes and the potential <br />traffic generated by the townhouses, townhouse were not appropriate for this site. None of <br />the residents spoke against the single family component. <br /> <br />Like the residents, the four Planning Commissioners that spoke also spoke against the <br />rezoning to R3, which would allow the townhouse component of the project. Their <br />comments did not address the merits of the preliminary plat other than they were opposed <br />to the townhouse component of the plat. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed tabling the application. The applicant requested that the <br />Commission move the project forward with either a recommendation to deny the request or <br />a recommendation to approve the request with conditions. The Commission voted 5-0 to <br />recommend denial of the request for the preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the request for <br />preliminary plat based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The rezoning was denied. <br />2. The plat does not comply with the dimensional requirements. <br />3. Public opposition to the request. <br /> <br />The Commission also added the following requirement to their recommendation: <br /> <br />· If the zone change is approved by the City Council, the Council should direct staff <br /> and the applicant to bring the plat back to the Planning Commission for review. <br /> <br />City Council Options <br /> <br />The following findings are offered should the Council deny the request for preliminary plat of <br />Twin Lakes Crossing: <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\P 02-05 Twin Lakes Crossing\P02-05junecc.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.