Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 7 <br /> November 19,2012 <br /> OUTLOTS A AND B SHALL BE PAID AT THE TIME THOSE LOTS ARE <br /> • RELEASED FOR RECORDING AT THE RATE ESTABLISHED AT THE <br /> TIME. <br /> 6. ALL REQUIRED SUBDIVISION/PARK INFORMATION SHALL BE <br /> PROVIDED IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT (.DWG FILE)AS REQUIRED <br /> BY THE CITY ORDINANCE AND LAND USE APPLICATION PRIOR TO <br /> RECORDING OF THE PLAT. <br /> 7. THIS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT SHALL EXPIRE AFTER <br /> ONE YEAR,UNLESS THE PROPERTY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT <br /> HAS RECORDED THE FINAL PLAT OR RECEIVED AN EXTENSION. <br /> MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 7.5 Conditional Use Permit:Alliance Machine/Bryan Provo for Outdoor Storage in the <br /> Business Park Zoning District,Case No. CU 12-17 <br /> Mr.Barnhart presented the staff report. <br /> MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS AND SECONDED BY <br /> COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE <br /> PERMIT, CASE NO. CU 12-17 TO THE DECEMBER 3,2012 CITY COUNCIL <br /> MEETING. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 8.1 Downtown Task Force Plan—Mississippi Connections <br /> Mr.Barnhart presented the staff report.He stated the biggest challenge is that a timeline <br /> • isn't known because there are no funds identified for Highway 10. <br /> Mayor Dietz and Councilmembers Gumphrey,Zerwas,and Westgaard stated they support <br /> the Plan and thanked the task force members for a great job. <br /> The following comments were noted: <br /> 1. There will be some areas of the Plan that will be incorporated into the downtown. <br /> 2. The Plan is a framework,a guiding document to work from as it takes in a lot of the <br /> aspects of the downtown.Any future recommendations based on the Plan would <br /> have to come back to Council for consideration. <br /> 3. Plan is important due to future Highway 10 development plans. City doesn't know <br /> when the Highway will develop,but Plan helps out so future growth and <br /> development not caught off-guard. <br /> 4. Proactive planning will assist the city. <br /> 5. Plan suggests incentives and programs to assist with preservation,if wanted <br /> 6. Important to connect past to future. <br /> Councilmember Motin further stated he appreciated the work and effort of the task force <br /> members but noted he would not support the Plan because he opposes parts of it for some <br /> of the following reasons: <br /> 1. Not viable for 30-40 years down the road. <br /> 2. Maintaining current buildings not feasible. <br /> 3. Concern to keep it as a draw for citizens within the community and the money that <br /> • would need to be spent to keep people here. <br />