Laserfiche WebLink
Rlk iver <br />REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />TO <br />ITEM NUMBER <br />City Council <br />8.1 <br />AGENDA SECTION <br />MEETING DATE <br />PREPARED BY <br />General Business <br />November 19, 2012 <br />Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION <br />REVIEWED By <br />Downtown Task Force's Plan <br />— Mississippi Connections <br />REVIEWED BY <br />ACTION REQUESTED <br />The Downtown Task Force, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and Staff recommend approval <br />of the Downtown Task Force's Mississippi Connections plan for downtown. <br />BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION <br />Over the last 12 months, the City Council- established Downtown Task Force has developed its plan, <br />Mississippi Connections, which is intended to redefine the greater downtown area and preserve its historic <br />character, while promoting the future viability of the area and the community by extension. The plan in <br />large part provides priorities and strategies to improve or otherwise help six distinct "neighborhoods" <br />throughout the plan area. <br />The document is broken into 4 parts: <br />Part I: Introduction. This section summarizes the document, and includes much of the `behind <br />the scenes' work on the project originally completed by the Task Force in 2006 and updated in 2012. <br />This includes the mission and vision statements, a review of existing conditions, and a review of the <br />strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) recognized in the study area. This section <br />references previous relevant studies, as many of these issues have been studied by plans as far back as <br />1970. This section also attempts to summarize the features of the area, including the natural amenities, <br />the transportation systems, and the heritage - forming attributes of the area. <br />Part II: Illustrative Master Plan. This section outlines the vision for the study area in both words <br />and the graphic. The plan is intended as a series of goals, policies, and tasks that once completed, <br />strengthen the study area into a recognizable neighborhood that is strong enough to sustain the negative <br />impacts of major transportation shifts brought on by Highway 10 improvements. These tasks and goals <br />were identified by the Task Force members, and reviewed by the public in two open houses. This section <br />summarizes the public comment process. Many of these goals, policies, and strategies were intended as <br />`work orders' for citizen and business groups, city boards and commissions, and the City Council. These <br />are strategies that the Task Force has identified as being most efficient in achieving the goals outlined in <br />Part I. These strategies are broken down into the six `neighborhoods.' <br />Part III: Implementation Priorities. This section takes the goals, policies and strategies outlined <br />in Part II and prioritizes them into three time periods: short term (0 -2 years), mid -term (3 -5 years), and <br />ongoing. The Task Force acknowledges that the march of time is not the only trigger associated with <br />P I r E A E U 9 4 <br />1`4ATUR <br />