Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 13 <br />October 13, 2003 <br />............................. <br /> <br /> that's done and the City Council has a chance to meet than we take your recommendation <br /> under advisement seriously. <br /> <br />Mr. Rohlf stated that the HPC has made their recommendations, but as individuals and also <br />HPC members, they have their own opinions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kragness stated that they are new as a Commission and that there is a lot of <br />procedural info that he doesn't understand. He would like to see it handled the same as for <br />the Planning Commission; they make a recommendation but if the project changes it is <br />referred back to the Planning Commission. This is the same procedural treatment that the <br />HPC would like to get. It is his desire to feel comfortable and to have ample opportunities <br />to furnish their recommendations. He also would like to see some Councilmembers attend <br />HPC workshops. There's lots of ways that preservation has speared positive things in the <br />city. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing stated it should have the same kind of process as other commissions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tveite stated that it needs to be a personal decision and doesn't feel the <br />need to put together a code of conduct for this group. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gongoll stated he feels that would create too much of unnecessary conflict. <br /> <br />Councilmember Motin agrees with Councilmember Tveite and that they need to use their <br />own judgment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gongoll stated that we recommend action to you, you make a decision, and <br />nine out of ten are in approval of the recommending body. He feels we have gnashing of <br />teeth over nothing. We need to respect the decision and respect the process. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing stated that we need to have a process in place. She does respect their <br />recommendations and she hears what they are saying and does take their recommendation <br />seriously. She knows that they have researched the issue, that they have the background to <br />come to Council with the best recommendation that can be made at that time, and she wants <br />them to know that they are taken seriously. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing stated that the commission should come to the Council with <br />recommendations that's current and if that changes, then yes the commission can come <br />forward and if they want to make another recommendation them come before them again. <br />If something bypasses them and they have concerns, the commission can still talk to <br />Council about it. <br /> <br />Historic Designation <br />Commissioner Kragness stated that we do have the power to create local historic districts <br />after going through a process and that enables some historic preservation tax credits for <br />homeowners and business owners. It gives a lot of benefits as well so there are economic <br />incentives once we do some designations. The biggest area of confusion is the <br />understanding of what's significant, what has integrity in terms of a building. The <br />consultant didn't find anything eligible for the National Register but does that mean they're <br />not important buildings, not significant. No, they didn't have historic integrity because they <br />have a lot of the facade on the downtown buildings covered up. As a consultant, they <br />cannot make a recommendation because they cannot see it. Because it is not on the <br />National Register doesn't mean that it doesn't have significance, it can have local <br />significance. <br /> <br /> <br />