Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />October 13, 2003 <br />............................. <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Mayor I~inzing stated so you see a clear difference between advocacy groups and the <br />commission. You see yourself as a commission who recommends to the City Council and <br />once that recommendation has been given then the commission moves on. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gongoll stated that you've asked us to do historic things; I can be an <br />advocate regardless. If we have a report, we are going to advocate that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuester stated that she felt that the recommendation that they make is a <br />form of advocacy and when the things come to Council, the Council needs to balance that <br />advocacy with things that need to be done, and that's how she sees the role as being <br />different. So when the Historical Commission comes and makes recommendations, she sees <br />that as an advocacy not necessarily making the decision but can make even two <br />recommendations that counter, and say that one is preferred and then Council will make the <br />final decision. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tveite feels that the first three bullet points under Section 2-214, Powers <br />and Duties, explain their duties. <br /> <br />Further discussion on advocacy took place. <br /> <br />Mayor I~inzing stated that it is true that there is a certain amount of creditability because <br />they are on the commission. The HPC is not an advocacy group; it is to bring <br />recommendations to the City Council. You have treated it that way very well, to bring <br />recommendation to the Council and probably there wasn't the communication from the <br />Council when the downtown plans changed and we should have asked for an addendum to <br />your recommendation because things had changed. That point needs to be made that we <br />should have had you come back with another recommendation or an addendum. There is <br />also that question as to how does HPC members advocate outside of the HPC for issues <br />that the City Council has already looked at and said we are not interested in that standpoint <br />right now. How is that seen and how is that done.; She feels that it could be a problem in <br />the future when the Council makes a decision and the group does not stand behind it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lundberg feels that she is wrong and that the issue is more pronounced in <br />her mind than in the Council's mind. He stated that there are very few people that know <br />about the HPC let alone that he is on the HPC. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuester stated that she is glad that it is being brought back as individuals <br />and that you haven't brought it back as the HPC and as individuals that you need to be able <br />to do that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuester stated that it can be a problem because on one hand we want those <br />people most passionately involved and most knowledgeable about local history to be on the <br />HPC and yet those are the very people who would lead a stronger advocacy so if you felt it <br />shouldn't be there, there should be an understanding that at that point you want people to <br />resign. I don't know if this is what you are advocating for or not. <br /> <br />Mr. Rohlf stated that a strong opposite view is healthy. <br /> <br />Mayor I~inzing stated that there can be disagreement and should be. You are here to <br />recommend things to us after you have a chance to look at it and I don't want a "yes" <br />group, that's not why you are here. You're here to make a strong recommendation but after <br /> <br /> <br />