Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />August 13, 2012 <br />— Dual stream recycling to single stream recycling <br />• — Garbage collection rate increases of 3% on the even - numbered years starting in <br />2014 <br />— Maintain recycling rates for 5 years <br />— $0.25 increase in recycling in years 2018 — 2022 <br />MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT FOR <br />GARBAGE, REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION JANUARY 1, 2013 <br />THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2022, WITH ALLIED WASTE AND RANDY'S <br />ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0. <br />6.2 Private Utility Service Connection Options <br />Justin Femrite stated there are three properties remaining to make repairs to their sewer <br />service lines, utilizing the option to have the cost assessed against their property. <br />Mr. Femrite explained there are 90 properties with sewer and water available but not <br />connected, and 105 properties that are connected to either water or sewer, but not both. He <br />stated that these 195 properties are in violation of the city's existing ordinances, which <br />requires hook-up within two years of availability. <br />Mr. Femrite discussed the five options for the Council to consider, as detailed in his memo. <br />Councilmember Gumphrey stated the minimum would be to require connection to city <br />services at the point of sale of a property. Councilmember Motin suggested the following: 1) <br />is Notify the property owner of the requirement, giving them the ability to finance through the <br />special assessment process; 2) city completes the work and charges the fees to the property <br />owner -if they don't pay, assess the cost; 3) Require connection at the point of sale or transfer <br />of the property; this option could allow or not allow assessment of costs. <br />Mayor Dietz stated he felt the best option was #4. He felt the responsibility was partly the <br />city's, by not following up with these properties when the two -year period expired. He <br />stated that properties could have changed hands many times since then. He stated they <br />should have had a system in place to catch those properties at the proper time. He stated <br />that if they are notified now, they will be aware that they will need to hook up at the time the <br />property sells or changes hands. He stated that property owners would not feel it was fair to <br />have to pay a user fee when they were not hooked up. Councilmember Dietz asked if the <br />cost to hook up to city services was around $15,000. Mr. Femrite stated that was a <br />reasonable estimate. <br />Councilmember Westgaard asked if Option #4 would allow a homeowner to replace a septic <br />system or well if it failed. Mr. Femrite stated no, staff would propose an ordinance <br />amendment that would require the property owner to hook up to both services at that time. <br />Staff still needs to discuss how to put checks and balances in place to catch those properties <br />that need to be hooked up. He stated that the list of properties will be checked and verified <br />whether or not they have sewer or water. <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated that connections charges are a huge financial hardship. <br />He stated he would be in favor of Option #4, adding language that a property owner with a <br />failing system that must connect to city services. Mr. Femrite asked if Councilmember <br />• Westgaard would like to see an assessment program to go along with Option #4. <br />Page 3 <br />