My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-2012 CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
08-13-2012 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 9:02:26 AM
Creation date
9/26/2012 8:58:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
8/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />August 13, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />5. Open Forum <br />Murlyne Beck, 114 Evans Avenue, spoke to the Council regarding the letter she received • <br />from the city's code enforcement officer. The letter stated she had 10 days to remove a <br />fence around her twin home. Mrs. Beck explained that her husband was in poor health and <br />they were not able to remove the fence in such a short time period. She stated that they had <br />the fence put up for their dog. She explained that they checked with a supervisor at the city <br />and was told it was ok to put up the fence. The letter stated that the fence could not be over <br />2' /z feet high above the level of the sidewalk within 10 feet of the front property line, and <br />could not be placed on the lot line. She stated the fence was to keep their dog on the <br />property and a 2'/2 ft. high fence would not make any sense. Mrs. Beck stated the neighbors <br />thought the fence was on their property, so the Becks had the property surveyed. The <br />survey showed that the Becks owned 2 more feet in the front and 4 feet more in the back <br />than previously thought. She did not feel the fence caused any visual impact, and noted that <br />the fence was installed before there was curbing. She spoke with city staff and told them she <br />wanted this issue placed on the agenda and was told they would object to placing it on the <br />agenda. She stated she needed more time to investigate the issue. She explained that the <br />situation has escalated with the neighbors and they have torn out her survey stakes. <br />Mayor Dietz asked if the situation started because the neighbor complained about the Beck's <br />fence. Mrs. Beck stated yes. She stated that the neighbor objects to them taking back the <br />land that belongs to the Becks according to the survey. She stated that the neighbors <br />threatened to call the city about the fence if the Becks did not give them the additional <br />property. She explained that taking back the land will cause the neighbor's lot line to be <br />crooked. <br />Mayor Dietz stated that staff will investigate the issue. Mrs. Beck stated she would like to • <br />have the city code reviewed (Sec 37 -96A). Mayor Dietz explained that staff will do some <br />research and asked if Mrs. Beck could come back to the next City Council meeting. She <br />stated yes. <br />Mayor Dietz asked if the time line for removal of the fence could be extended an additional <br />30 days. Mr. Barnhart stated yes. Mayor Dietz asked if staff would be able to have <br />information for the Council next Monday night. Mr. Barnhart stated yes. <br />Bruce West, 13181 Island View Drive, asked if the existing public works building would be <br />painted to match the new building. <br />Street Superintendent Mark Thompson stated that when the new building is complete and <br />the landscaping is installed, they will determine the visual effect of the two buildings <br />together. Councilmember Motin stated that it was his understanding that the architectural <br />plans tie the two buildings together. Mr. Thompson stated yes, the new building matches <br />the color scheme. <br />5.2 Residential Garbage and Recycling Contract Renewal <br />Councilmember Motin asked why recycling is every other week, since they will be switching <br />to single source recycling. Ms. Haug stated that the contractors asked for every other week <br />pickup, since the customers are not filling their containers every week. <br />Ms. Haug explained changes in the contract, including: S <br />— Changing from a 5 -pear contract to a 10 -year contract <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.