My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.5. ERMUSR 09-11-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2012
>
09-11-2012
>
2.5. ERMUSR 09-11-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2012 4:15:04 PM
Creation date
9/10/2012 4:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
9/11/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docket No. TS11-2-000, et al. - 5 - <br /> 10. Turning to the merits of Owensboro's waiver request, Louisville Gas claims that <br /> other circumstances are present that warrant denying Owensboro's request for waiver of <br /> the Standards of Conduct requirements.15 Louisville Gas believes that without the <br /> discipline required by the Standards of Conduct, Owensboro could use non-public <br /> information about generator or transmission outages to maximize sales opportunities <br /> and improperly influence the market. In its answer, Owensboro argues that (a) certain <br /> communications restrictions on its power marketer and transmission provider and <br /> (b) certain reliability agreements restrain its ability to share information, and should <br /> mitigate Louisville Gas's concerns.16 Louisville Gas responds that such restraints do not <br /> provide adequate assurance that Owensboro will not use such information to benefit itself <br /> or its affiliates if the waiver request is granted.' <br /> 11. Having considered the representations in Owensboro's filing, the opposition <br /> thereto, and the subsequent answers, the Commission grants Owensboro's requests for <br /> waivers from both the requirement to maintain and establish an OASIS and the <br /> requirement to comply with the Standards of Conduct. As both parties note, the <br /> Commission generally grants waivers of its Standards of Conduct requirements to small <br /> electric utilities that have not relinquished control over the operation of their transmission <br /> systems to an ISO/RTO, which remain in effect unless and until the Commission takes <br /> is Louisville Gas Protest at 1-2. <br /> 16 Owensboro Answer at 1-3. Owensboro adds that Big Rivers Electric <br /> Corporation (Big Rivers) has little incentive to share information with Owensboro <br /> because, even though Owensboro has hired Big Rivers to perform certain transmission- <br /> operation functions, Big Rivers is Owensboro's competitor. Owensboro Answer at 8-9. <br /> Owensboro also disputes that Big Rivers would use Owensboro as a conduit for sharing <br /> information with ACES Power Marketing (ACES). In this regard, Owensboro explains <br /> that Big Rivers is a member of ACES and, thus, it would have no need to use Owensboro <br /> as a conduit for such communications. Moreover, Big Rivers has adopted Standards of <br /> Conduct (filed with the Commission) that prohibit Big Rivers from providing non-public <br /> transmission information to ACES directly or from using anyone as a conduit to do so. <br /> Id. Owensboro also notes that Big Rivers represented to the Commission that it had <br /> already implemented measures with respect to its Transmission Function to guarantee <br /> that it is physically and functionally independent from activities associated with ACES <br /> and those measures are codified in its Standards of Conduct. Id. at 9-10. <br /> " Louisville Gas Answer at 1-2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.