Laserfiche WebLink
Management's Discussion and Analysis -Continued <br />STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS <br />While [he Statements of Ne[ Assets shows the change in financial position of net assets, the Statements of Revenues, Expenses <br />and Changes in Ne[ Assets, provides answers as to the nature and source of these changes. As can be seen in Table A-2, the <br />increase in "Operating Revenues" was the main source of [he increase in net assets of 1,630,809 in fiscal 2011. A closer <br />examination of the individual categories affecting the source of changes in net assets is discussed below: <br />TABLE A-2 <br />Condensed Statements of Revenues, <br />Expenses and Changes in Net Assets <br /> Increase <br /> 2011 2010 (Decrease) <br />Revenues <br />Operating $ 30,416,803 $ 28,706,223 $ 1,710,580 <br />Nonoperating 300,813 2]8,266 82,547 <br />Total revenues 30,717,616 28,924,489 1,793,127 <br />Expenses <br />Operating 28,421,809 27,107,250 1,314,559 <br />Nonoperating 437,259 448,818 (11,559) <br /> <br />Total expenses 28,859,068 27,556,068 1,303,000 <br />Income before contributions and operating transfers 1,858,548 1,368,421 490,127 <br />Capital Contributions -Developer Infrastructure and Connection Fees 195,853 460,534 (264,681) <br />Transfers from other City funds 312,823 71,655 241,168 <br />Transfers to other City funds (736,415) (682,086) (54,329) <br /> <br />Change in net assets 1,630,809 1,218,524 412,285 <br />Net assets, January 1 47,583,084 46,364,560 1,218,524 <br />Net assets, December 31 <br />Revenues <br />$ 49,213,893 $ 47,583,084 $ 1,630,809 <br />Table A-2 shows that operating revenue increased by 6 percent in 201 I for the Water and Electric Departments combined. This <br />increase was a result of increased usage in the commercial sector. The increase in electric revenues offsets the water revenues <br />being down approximately 5 percent from decreased lawn watering, due to the wet spring and mild summer. <br />Nonoperating revenue increased 20 percent as a result of transmission rebate revenue in the Electric Department, and water tower <br />lease revenue in the Water Department. In 2007 the Electric Utility partnered with Midwest Municipal Transmission Group <br />(MMTG) in order to have our transmission assets recognized in the Midwest Independent System Operator (MISO) transmission <br />market. In doing so, our transmission assets generate a revenue rebate, which in [urn helps keep our rates down. In 2011, rebates <br />received from our 2009 Flings were approximately $5,000 per month. The Water Department is receiving lease revenue from <br />Sprint for antennas on [he water towers. In 201 I this amount was approximately $84,000, and will continue for the duration of <br />the multi-year contract. <br />Between the two departments, Connection Fees increased approximately $10,000; Electric decreased approximately $30,000 and <br />Water increased approximately $40,000. <br />16 <br />