My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.0. SR 03-23-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1998
>
03/23/1998
>
7.0. SR 03-23-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:07 AM
Creation date
9/29/2003 8:29:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/23/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CIP Worksession <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />both parking lot options save as many trees as possible and <br />almost double the available public parking spaces. We will be <br />adding between 15 and 16 new parking stalls to the existing 17 <br />stalls and this is about what was expected. The land and house <br />acquisition costs were in the $83,000 neighborhood and the cost <br />of the public improvements will be in the $20,000 neighborhood. <br /> <br />Discuss city participation in the Lake Orono project - The <br />proposal calls for the city to be assessed about $57,000 for its 26 <br />units on the lake and then for the city to "contribute" through <br />tax dollars about $340,000 to the project. It is recommended <br />that the $100,000 CIP funds that were in the 1998 tax levy be <br />dedicated towards this project and that this CIP levy in the year <br />1999 be increased to $200,000. Therefore, most of the city <br />contribution can be available by the end of 1999 to pay offthe <br />city's obligation. It is then my recommendation to keep this <br />$200,000 CIP levy in the budget and to apply these funds <br />toward the new pavement replacement program which is <br />hopefully going to be approved in 1999 and begin in the year <br />2000. The city will need to add at least this much money <br />annually to the assessments (to the benefited property owners) <br />in order to do a project annually that is of any significance or <br />makes any impact in neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Ice Arena project <br />· Review construction project figures...Attached for your review <br /> is the ice arena construction figures which are subject to only <br /> very minor changes. It should be noted that the sewer and <br /> water utilities, which came in higher than expected, were <br /> always outside of the project budget and considered a <br /> donation from the city and the Utilities. Excluding this <br /> expenditure, the project came in very close to the original <br /> $2.65 million budget. The total was about 2 percent over <br /> budget. Unfortunately most of this overrun, or approximately <br /> $39,000 of the overrun, is a city obligation. The Council has <br /> previously indicated that this overrun would come out of the <br /> equipment reserves and the capital projects reserve. <br />· Review funding options for the heating, dehumidification, <br /> and ventilation project...This expense is estimated to <br /> approach $150,000, but could be less. This cost really should <br /> have been part of the original construction project but was <br /> deleted in the hope that an alternative system would meet <br /> our needs. This expenditure can not be absorbed within the <br /> ice arena operating budget and an alternative source of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.