My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1. SR 03-19-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2012
>
03-19-2012
>
8.1. SR 03-19-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2012 10:56:30 AM
Creation date
3/16/2012 10:54:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/19/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LINDAU <br />COMPANIES, INC. <br />PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS <br />1074 OLn HwY 35 <br />HuosoN, WI 54016 <br />March 14, 2O 12 (715) 386-4444 OFFICE <br />Rich Czech <br />Arena Manager <br />1000 School Street <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />Re: Elk River Skating Facility -Structural Assessment Report <br />Dear Rich, <br />Per your direction we have prepared this proposal for the Structural Assessment for the <br />"Barn" ice skating facility in the City of Elk River. We visited the site on Wednesday, <br />February 15, 2012 as an aid in preparing this proposal. <br />This Structural Assessment is a follow up to the work Lindau Companies, Inc. performed <br />in 2009. At that time some of the steel structure had corroded but we did not feel it <br />posed a structural concern if remedied. We propose to review the same areas, as well as <br />some new areas, and note any further deterioration. Additionally we recommend a <br />testing agency be employed to measure the thickness of various steel elements. <br />American Engineering and Testing uses an Ultrasonic Thickness Transducer to determine <br />the thickness of the base metal within corroded steel. <br />The report will note our opinions and recommendations. <br />Our review, observations, and opinions relate solely to the building structure and not to <br />non-structural items such as architecture, egress, mechanical and plumbing systems, or <br />environmental considerations. In the case that we note non-structural issues within our <br />report it is for the sole purpose of noting the need for the review of these items by a <br />professional trained in that discipline. <br />Additionally we suggest that a review of the building layout and architecture be reviewed <br />by an architect in order to present potential remodeling and upgrading options. <br />Contract Literature and Scone of Services <br />At this time we anticipate our scope of work to be as follows: <br />• Review the previously exposed steel structure for any changes in condition <br />since our last visit. <br />• Expose a few areas of steel structure and comment on our findings. <br />• Present a proposed timeline for the structure outlining what we believe to be <br />its useful future life. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.