My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 02-17-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1998
>
02/17/1998
>
6.1. SR 02-17-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:06 AM
Creation date
9/22/2003 9:10:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Mayor and City Council/GP 97-5 <br />February 17, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />City Ordinance <br /> <br />When the Closure Statement first came before the City Council in 1996, the <br />City Council elected to pass an ordinance regarding the closure of <br />manufactured home parks. This ordinance was tailored after other <br />communities that have passed similar ordinances. The ordinance mirrors <br />State Statutes 327(C).095 in many respects and goes further to clarify a few <br />of the processes involved in closing a mobile home park. Subsequent <br />amendments were made to the ordinance specifically relating to the time in <br />which residents must be compensated prior to closing of the park or its <br />conversion to another use. This time period was adjusted from 60 days to its <br />current reading of 90 days (see attached ordinance for further information). <br />The ordinance also clearly spells out the party (developer) responsible for <br />purchasing mobile homes and the responsible party for relocation (park <br />owner) of the mobile homes to another park. <br /> <br />What is the role of the City Council in closing a mobile home park? <br /> <br />Staff originally outlined three alternatives the Council may choose to be <br />involved with closing of a mobile home park. Basically, these included: <br /> <br />Council conducts a public hearing and relying on the park owner to <br />complete closure of the mobile home park in accordance with all the <br />State Statutes; <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Council may wish to act as a monitoring agent and require the park <br />owner report back to the City Council with status reports and the <br />progress made in closing of the mobile home park; or, lastly, <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />the Council may take a more "hands on" approach to facilitating the <br />closure of the mobile home park by adopting a city ordinance similar to <br />the City of Bloomington and a few other communities which have gone <br />through a similar process. <br /> <br />The Council elected to adopt a city ordinance and involve the City to a <br />greater extent to make sure the park closure was handled equitably for the <br />mobile home park residents. One of the major components of the adopted <br />ordinance required the developer to compensate residents wishing to sell <br />their mobile home. Compensation would be based on the appraised value of <br />the mobile home as determined by an independent appraiser experienced in <br />mobile home park appraisal and approved by the City Administrator. <br /> <br />The appraisal of the remaining mobile homes was completed last year. <br />Based on the costs outlined in a Tax Increment Financing application <br /> <br />f:\shrdoc\council\gp97-5.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.