My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 10-11-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2011
>
10-11-2011
>
4.1. ERMUSR 10-11-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 2:39:52 PM
Creation date
10/10/2011 2:39:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
10/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Via a-mail <br />September 27, 2011 <br />Mr. Troy Adams, P.E. <br />Utilities Director <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities <br />P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN 55330-0430 <br />Subject: Power Supply Analysis <br />Dear Mr. Adams: <br />Thank you for taking the time to meet with Rich Macke and me on Tuesday, September 20, <br />2011. <br />We aze confident that Power System Engineering, Inc. (PSE) has the necessary skill sets to <br />provide strategic analysis to assist Elk River Municipal Utilities (ERMU) in making a power <br />supply decision. There aze many changes occurring in the electric industry at this time that <br />complicate the process of selecting a power supply resource. There aze also considerations as the <br />type of organization that is providing ERMU with power supply resources. As one example, <br />municipal and cooperative suppliers have greater alignment to ERMU in terms of not having to <br />satisfy both investors and customers at the same time. <br />Our understanding of the situation is that ERMU has been given notice on the power supply <br />contract from Connexus Energy that will terminate in September 2018. ERMU has also been <br />participating in a power supply evaluation with Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency <br />(CMMPA) that is expected to include an adequate resource mix for the long-teen power supply <br />needs. An eazly decision is needed whether to continue with this approach, or evaluate other <br />options, with at least four other entities being identified as possible power supply providers at <br />this point. <br />PSE has extensive experience in Power Supply analysis with municipal entities, including with <br />Escanaba, Norway, Crystal Falls, and Gladstone, Michigan. Work in the 2003-2005 timeframe <br />focused on evaluating the power supply options for five municipals and two small cooperatives, <br />including purchase power options, and also considering aself--build alternative. Work with <br />Escanaba, Michigan has involved a wide range of power supply evaluations, including <br />demonstrating the economics of self-generation compared to market purchases, market-based <br />proposals vs. formula based proposals, impacts on the MISO mazket pricing from the supply <br />node to the purchasing party's load node on power supply alternatives (typically called basis <br />risk), evaluation of a fix for float financial hedging transaction, and negotiating contracts related <br />to the power supply issues. PSE also assisted Great River Energy (GRE) members in evaluating <br />the economics of purchasing 10 percent of their energy from an outside resource, and thus <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.