My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7. EDSR 09-11-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
09-11-2006
>
7. EDSR 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:22:45 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 11:19:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
9/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(2) the creation or functioning of a public service corporation; or <br />(3) mitigation of a blighted area, remediation of an environmentally <br />contaminated area, reduction of abandoned property, or removal of a public <br />nuisance. <br />In case there were any doubt, the definition adds this statement in response to the <br />Kelo v. City of New London decision: "The public benefits of economic <br />development, including an increase in tax base, tax revenues, employment, or <br />general economic health, do not by themselves constitute a public use or public <br />purpose." <br />Clause (3) describes the only circumstances when eminent domain may be used for <br />acquisitions other than traditional public takings (under clause 1) or for public <br />service corporations (under clause 2). Because eminent domain for development or <br />redevelopment always results in the ultimate possession or ownership of acquired <br />property by a private party, this power will now be available only if the conditions <br />described in clause (3) may be found. <br />The four conditions for redevelopment takings are summarized as follows: <br />1. Mitigation of a blighted area: This is the most significant change in the <br />entire bill. For a frame of reference, consider the prior definition of a blighted area <br />under Minnesota Statues, Section 469.002, subd. 1 I <br />"Blighted area" means any area with buildings or improvements <br />which, by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence, overcrowding, faulty <br />arrangement or design, lack of ventilation, light and sanitary <br />facilities, excessive land coverage, deleterious land use, or obsolete <br />layout, or any combination of these or other factors, are detrimental <br />to the safety, health, morals, or welfare of the community. <br />Section 117.025, subd. 6 now defines "blighted area" as an area that is in "urban <br />use," and where "more than 50 percent of the buildings are structurally <br />substandard." <br />Section 117.025, subd. 7 defines a "structurally substandard" building as one: <br />(1) that was inspected by the appropriate local government and cited for <br />one or more enforceable housing, maintenance, or building code <br />violations; <br />Comment: The inclusion of housing and maintenance codes is broader <br />than in the House version of the bill, which limited this definition to building <br />codes only. This addition provides some leeway for cities to determine their <br />own standards of upkeep, which in turn could result in more buildings being <br />III-2 Kennedy & Graven <br />200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.