My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7. EDSR 09-11-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
09-11-2006
>
7. EDSR 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:22:45 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 11:19:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
9/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE SHOE FALLS: <br />WHAT THE LEGISLATURE DID TO REDEVELOPMENT TAHINGS <br />Stephen J. Bubul <br />In Minnesota Laws 2006, Chapter 214 (Senate File 2750), the legislature adopted sweeping <br />changes to the statutes governing eminent domain for economic development and <br />redevelopment. This article summarizes the changes and discusses some of the potential <br />impacts on the ability of local authorities to carry out development efforts. <br />I. REDEVELOPMENT STATUTES SUPERSEDED. <br />Section 1 of the bill creates a new Section 117.012, containing these provisions <br />Subdivision 1. This provision consolidates all eminent domain powers for all <br />political subdivisions in Chapter 117, "notwithstanding any charter provision, <br />ordinance, statute or special law." While development and redevelopment statutes <br />have refen•ed to Ch. 117 for eminent domain procedures, the powers that enable the <br />use of eminent domain have historically been provided in various sections of <br />Chapter 469. This preemption clause removes any doubt that powers of eminent <br />domain for development purpose might still be found in other statutes. <br />Subdivision 2. This clause states that eminent domain "may only be used for a <br />public use or a public purpose." This would seem to be an obvious restatement of <br />the law, but Ch. 214 later outlines precisely what the terms "public use" and "public <br />purpose" mean, which sharply limits the scope of those concepts. <br />Subdivision 3. This provision provides an exception to general rules described <br />above, permitting continues use of eminent domain powers under other laws for <br />certain drainage project, town roads and watershed districts. <br />II. CRITERIA FOR EMINENT DOMAIN IN REDEVELOPMENT CONTEXT. <br />Section 2 of the bill amends the existing definition section in Ch. 117, primarily to <br />describe and limit the circumstances in which eminent domain may be used for <br />development and redevelopment. <br />The key definition is public use or public purpose, which terms are defined in <br />Section 117.025, Subdivision 11 to mean exclusively: <br />(1) The possession, occupation, ownership and enjoyment of the land by the <br />general public, or by public agencies; <br />III-1 Kennedy & Graven <br />200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.