My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6. EDSR 08-14-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
08-14-2006
>
6. EDSR 08-14-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2011 1:01:37 PM
Creation date
9/29/2011 12:20:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
8/14/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Target Industry Selection <br />The preceding work will be used to produce an overall evaluation of attractiveness <br />for each potentially targeted industry. The Project Team will use this evaluation as <br />the basis from which to make a recommendation of a target industry for further <br />development. <br />The recommendation will address the goal of adding at least two businesses to the <br />region-one in Sherburne County and one in Wright County. Opportunities will be <br />noted for identifying complementary and cooperative suppliers rather than <br />competitive ones. <br />The industry overviews, supplier analyses, potential supplier profiles, and evaluative <br />assessments will be presented to the ENSA Workgroup at a presentation meeting to <br />support decision-making. The intention is that the ENSA Workgroup will choose <br />one industry to pursue as the project moves into Phase Two. <br />B. Phase Two: Enterprise Network Feasibility Assessment <br />It should be noted that the selection of a target industry is not sufficient to define the <br />types of companies to target. As will be shown in the results of Phase One, there can <br />be numerous product and market opportunities within a selected industry. The <br />proposed outcome of Phase Two will be the development of target company profiles <br />that will define the types of companies most likely to be successful as initial focal <br />points for an enterprise network. In addition, the Project Team will produce a <br />preliminary feasibility assessment for locating such companies in the region. <br />Phase Two will begin by developing working hypotheses as to the types of companies <br />to target. As these preliminary profiles are tested throughout the phase, they will be <br />modified, abandoned or replaced with more viable options. <br />Although Phase One addresses "good fit" by means of supplier analyses for the target <br />industries, Phase Two drives down more deeply into issues of fit by means of <br />interviewing. Interview subjects will include potential local suppliers, manufacturers <br />in the target industry, industry experts, local entrepreneurs, and local manufacturers <br />in related businesses potentially able to expand into the target industry. Note that <br />previous research results and additional secondary research will be used to identify <br />interview subjects and to guide the questioning. <br />The feasibility assessment will address the following: <br />Supplier Types. The Project Team will select representative <br />suppliers from the local supplier types to be interviewed. For supplier <br />types not available locally, the analyst will determine the location of <br />other sources of supply. Target industry experts and manufacturers <br />will be asked to discuss the importance of geographic proximity of <br />suppliers. <br />Minnesota Technology, Inc. and Knowledge Based Solutions <br />West Metro Fringe Enterprise Network Systems Analysis Project Proposal <br />May 24, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.