Laserfiche WebLink
' "' ~; <br />i ~ <br />f ~' <br />CONSTRUCTION Bid Cateeorv 2C -Site Concrete <br />Only one bid was received for this bid category. It was determined that due to the very <br />small quantity of curb work for Phase I, that many companies were resistant to pursue the <br />process of submitting a bid bond and a subsequent performance and payment bond, <br />required with a public bid award, and thus did not submit a bid. Based on the receipt of <br />only one bid we recommend that the City Council .reject this bid of this bid category. <br />Since last Thursday 1tJM Construction has contacted several site concrete contractors to <br />solicited quotes, in lieu of public bids, to perform this work. A total of five (5) quotes <br />were received. Based on review of the quotes and scope with the low contractor we <br />recommend the award for this quote category be made as follows: <br />CR Fischer Contract Amount: $ 10,850 <br />Bid CateEOry 6A -Salt Storage Relocation /Foundations <br />A total of two (Z) bids were received for this bid category. The low bid received was <br />substantially lower than the next bidder. In our review of the bids with the two bidders <br />we determined that the difference. in the .bids was in the cast estimated for the relocation <br />of the existing storage shed. We have learned that the low bidder has extensive <br />experience with this work and are confident that their numbers are accurate for the work <br />specified. Based on review of the bid and scope with the low contractor we recommend <br />the award for this bid category be made as follows: <br />Greystone Construction Contract Amount: $ 234,990 <br />As noted above, this bid category includes the removal and relocation of the City's <br />existing salt shed structure. The manufacturer for this structure is a company named <br />Cover-All, who has gone out of business. It has been brought to our attention that there <br />is a possibility that the existing structure may not have been designed properly for the <br />current building codes. We are in the process of engaging a structural engineer who can <br />evaluate if this is the case. Should it be determined that the existing structure is deficient <br />there are two options to pursue. The first would be to design and install supplemental <br />support to the existing structure. The second option would be to provide and install a new <br />shed struchire for an estimated amount of $40,000, after slight redesign of the new <br />foundations. A recommendation will be made to the City Council once this information <br />is received for approval of one of these two options. <br />Bid Cate~oryllA -Fuel Island <br />A total of three (3) bids were received for this bid category. As part of the bid, the <br />~ ~~ ='"~"'~ contractors were required to provide a bid alternate cost to add a steel overhead canopy at <br />she fuel island. Based on review of the bid and scope with the low contractor we <br />recommend the award forthsbid category be made as follows. Should the City Council <br />decide. to approve the fuel island canopy, the amount of the alternate cost would be added <br />to the contract amount stated below: <br />~~-_~ <br />Pump and Meter Service, Inc. Contract Amount: $ 176,255.92 <br />Fuel Canopy Alternate: $ 22,274.93 <br />~.,~~ <br />~~~~~ <br />