My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.9. SR 09-06-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
09-06-2011
>
6.9. SR 09-06-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2011 8:46:51 AM
Creation date
9/2/2011 9:30:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/6/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~i <br />The development of higher density residential, commercial, and light industrial <br />properties may also result in parking lot and building lighting. The City's adopted <br />lighting ordinance will be applied to new development. This ordinance limits the <br />foot-candles of light outside a development site and requires light pollution <br />reduction measures such as downcast cut-off lighting. <br />Visual Impacts Mitigation Plan <br />• Through the plan review process, the City shall require appropriate screening <br />and buffers of development in the study area to screen for visual impacts. <br />27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations. Is the project subject to an <br />adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other <br />applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, <br />state or federal agency? ®Yes ^ No <br />If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain <br />how any conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. <br />Elk River has an existing Comprehensive Plan that was completed in 2004.Of the <br />three scenarios developed as part of this AUAR, Scenario 2 and Scenario 3 would <br />require modifications to the Comprehensive Plan to allow the land uses that are <br />being proposed. Redevelopment under Scenario 1 can be completed without a <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment. The City of Elk River is outside of the <br />Metropolitan Council jurisdiction; however the City's Comprehensive Plan complies <br />with the requirements set out in Minnesota Rules 4410.3610, Subpart 1, which <br />requires local comprehensive plans to address land use, transportation, and <br />sanitary sewer systems and include an implementation program. <br />Development within the study area is subject to the standards, policies, regulations, <br />and ordinance approved by the City. These plans include: <br />• City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan <br />City of Elk River Transportation Plan <br />Scenario 1 <br />Scenario 1 represents Elk River's existing Comprehensive Plan (2004), and <br />therefore it is compatible with the land use designations adopted. The densities <br />analyzed in this scenario represent the densities allowed by the Comprehensive <br />Plan. No Comprehensive Plan amendments or updates would be necessary for <br />redevelopment to proceed as outlined in this scenario. Scenario 1 is shown in <br />Figure 6-1. <br />Scenario 2 <br />Scenario 2 is based on the City of Elk River's 171St Avenue Focused Area STudy <br />(FAST) as depicted in Figure 6-2. This master plan provides a framework for future <br />development pattern in and around the area of Scenario 2. This Scenario would <br />require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. This <br />scenario evaluates the low end of the density ranges and a lower FAR. <br />City of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />August 2011 <br />Page 87 of 90 <br />0 <br />~i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.