My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.9. SR 09-06-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
09-06-2011
>
6.9. SR 09-06-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2011 8:46:51 AM
Creation date
9/2/2011 9:30:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/6/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 21- 5 -Intersection Level of Service Ranges <br /> <br /> <br />A ~ <br />.., <br /><_10 ~ ~- - ~ <br />• <br /><_10 <br />B 10-20 10-15 <br />C 20-35 15-25 <br />D 35 - 55 25 - 35 <br />E 55 - 80 35 - 50 <br />F >80 >50 <br />Source: HCM <br />LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes <br />referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It <br />should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases <br />where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on <br />the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a <br />two-way sTOP condition to an all-way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized <br />intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major <br />road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on <br />minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive <br />effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. <br />Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to <br />construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the <br />benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection <br />or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest <br />acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable <br />minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations. <br />or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. <br />The LOS analysis for the 171 Avenue Area AUAR was performed using <br />Synchro/SimTraffic: <br />Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) <br />methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an <br />input database for turning-movement volumes, lane geometries, and signal <br />design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize <br />signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is <br />transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. <br />• SimTraffic is amicro-simulation computer modeling software that simulates <br />each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to <br />traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model <br />simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as <br />City of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />August 2011 <br />Page 62 of 90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.