My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
08-08-2011
>
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 9:51:07 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 9:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
No. 3 a 15-inch gravity sewer line would be required. For Scenario No. 1 a 10- <br />inch diameter sewer would be recommended to serve the area along the west <br />side of TH 10. For Scenarios No. 2 and No. 3 a 15-inch gravity sewer line is <br />recommended for carrying the projected flows from the portion of the study <br />area west of TH 10 to allow for potential future development south of the study <br />area. <br />Wastewater from the portion of the study area between TH 10 and the <br />Burlington Northern Railroad could be conveyed north and connected to the <br />existing 15-inch sewer just south of 171St Avenue that extends north to 173ra <br />Avenue. For all three scenarios, a 10-inch gravity sewer would be large enough <br />to convey the estimated peak hour flow from the portion of the study area <br />between TH 10 and the Burlington Northern Railroad. However, because the <br />current urban service area boundaries extend beyond the limits of the study <br />area, a 12-inch sanitary sewer is recommended to provide additional capacity <br />for future development. <br />19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions. <br />a. Approximate depth (in feet) to groundwater: 13 minimum; 65 <br />average <br />Approximate depth (in feet) to bedrock: 151 minimum; 175 <br />average <br />b. Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and <br />also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone <br />formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize <br />environmental problems due to any of these hazards. <br />Information from the MPCA indicates that the study area is not in an active karst <br />area. No limestone, sinkholes or karst conditions are known at the site. <br />c. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. <br />Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from <br />wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any <br />mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. <br />The soils within the study area, as in other areas of Elk River, are sandy and are <br />conducive to infiltration. Most of the area has a hydrologic soils group of A with <br />some areas of B/D. (See Item 17 for more information about soil infiltration <br />rates.) This high infiltration rate can pose a risk to groundwater. Table 19-1 <br />lists the soils present on the site and Figure 16-1 shows the location of these <br />soils. <br />The Minnesota Geological Survey indicated the bedrock for the majority of the <br />site is between 151-200 feet below the surface. The Sherburne County Water <br />City of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 <br />Page SI of 84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.