My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
08-08-2011
>
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 9:51:07 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 9:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
area, a 12-inch sanitary sewer is recommended to provide additional capacity <br />for future development. <br />G. Traffic and Transportation <br />G1. Realignment /extension of Twin Lakes Road (as Twin Lakes Parkway) from 171St <br />Avenue to south of TH 10 / TH 169 to accommodate future traffic growth in the <br />area. The roadway cross section should include four (4) lanes with left turn lanes <br />at the primary intersections. <br />G2. The future primary full movement access (Twin Lakes Parkway) to TH 10 / 169 in <br />the area should be at a location as far south of the TH 10 /169 /101 interchange as <br />possible (as approved by Mn/DOT). <br />G3. Anew traffic signal system should be constructed at the TH 10 / 169 and Twin <br />Lakes Parkway intersection, with the first development in the area to <br />accommodate projected traffic until such time as a third lane on TH 10 / 169 or an <br />interchange is constructed. The intersection should include dual left turn lanes <br />for southbound Twin Lakes Parkway to eastbound TH 10 / 169 and dual left turn <br />lanes for eastbound TH 10 / 169 to northbound Twin Lakes Parkway. <br />' G4. The existing traffic signal at TH 10 / 169 and 171St Avenue should be maintained <br />until such time as the new interchange is constructed to accommodate current and <br />future traffic demand. <br />G5. Depending on how and where development occurs in the area and how traffic on <br />TH 10 / 169 increases, a third lane on TH 10 / 169 and (or) an interchange at Twin <br />Lakes Parkway should be planned. Assuming a straight line growth in traffic from <br />existing conditions TH 10 / 169 will require either the third lane or interchange by <br />2015 for Scenario 1 and 2013 for Scenario 2 or 3. If the third lane is construction <br />the interchange would be needed by 2023 for Scenario 1, 2019 for Scenario 2 or <br />2017 for Scenario 3. <br />G6. A standard diamond interchange can be constructed to accommodate the <br />projected 2031 traffic for Scenario 1, however for Scenario 2 and Scenario 3 an <br />interchange with additional capacity, such as a single point or diverging diamond <br />would be required. Preliminary concept plans to identify right of way needs <br />should be completed as part of the Twin Lakes Road extension project. <br />G7. The internal roadway and intersections can be constructed as development occurs <br />in the area. These roadways should have a two (2) lane cross section with turn <br />lanes at the primary intersections. <br />G8. The intersection of Twin Lakes Parkway and 168 Avenue will experience delays <br />' by 2031 in all Scenarios and should be constructed to accommodate a signal <br />system or roundabout in the future when traffic volumes indicate the need. <br />City of Elk River <br />' Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 Page 13 of 84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.