My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. PCSR 07-12-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2011
>
07-12-2011
>
5.2. PCSR 07-12-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2011 8:39:21 AM
Creation date
7/8/2011 8:36:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
7/12/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: CU 11-09 <br />Page 3 <br />Guazdian Angels by the Lake <br />Conditional Use Permit to amend the PUD <br />7. bill fully comply with all other requirements of this Code, including any applicable requirements and standards <br />for the issuance of a license or permit to establish and operate .the proposed use in the city. <br />If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by <br />findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section <br />30-654. <br />In the review of the standards for CUP as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all of <br />these standards. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />Lots/density -The original development proposal included a request to amend the land use plan from <br />Medium Density Residential to High density residential. This was approved. High density <br />residential in 1998 (Using the 1995 Comprehensive Plan) allowed for up to 22 units per acre. <br />Proposed density for 100 units (20 in townhomes, and 80 in assisted living) on 8.31 acres was 12.04. <br />In 2004, the Comprehensive Plan was amended, guiding the subject property to Urban Residential, <br />with densities prescribed between 8 and up to 20 per acre. The increased number of units is <br />consistent with the Comprehensive plain. The arithmetic: 110 units (20 townhomes + 60 existing <br />assistant living units + 30 proposed units) on .8.31 acres is 13.24 units per acre. <br />Natural Resources <br />A central issue during the original review of the Planned Unit Development was the impact to the shore <br />land protection ordinances in place. Shoreland Rules provided for a maximum of 25% impervious <br />.surface area on areas of the project adjacent to Lake Orono. After much discussion, a variance was <br />granted, on March 16, 1998, permitting up to 35% of impervious surface. Primarily, this area affected the <br />entire project as a whole, including the assisted living, the townhomes, and the commercial areas. To be <br />consistent with the findings of the 1998 variance, the total square feet of impervious surface must not be <br />increased. <br />The 1998 approval proposed 35,620 square feet, with a future addition totaling up to 49,019 square feet. <br />The 2011 proposal adds 12,345 square feet of footprint, resulting in a 47,965 sq ft, less than the 49,019 <br />maximum. While an increase in the number of units is proposed, no increase to the footprint or <br />impervious surface is proposed. The plan remains consistent with the original 1998 variance. <br />Parking <br />The parking requirements for the project are: <br />1 space per 4 rooms, based on a nursing facility, plus <br />1 space per staff, plus <br />1 space per facility vehicle <br />Based on the narrative and proposal with 90 rooms and 80 staff, 103 spaces would be required. The <br />existing parking lot on the north and south sides of the building provides 116 spaces, meeting the <br />requirement. No additional parking is proposed. <br />N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 11-09 Guazdian Angels\CU 11-09 Guardian Angels phase II SR to PC 7- <br />12-11.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.